Take the terms infinite and perpetuity, as far as we know neither of these terms are observably true. We have not seen anything that goes on forever or lasts forever, and yet we use them in conversation.
Relative to us things outlast us making that comparison easier.
Prove that he exists. Don't say nature, or the compexity of life, we can prove how this came about, and it wasn't from an omnipotent watchmaker.
So god is a he. If you limit god to a male human, then you're asking me to prove god personified as a male human. You're limiting god to that, because that is what you're limiting the proof to. You say prove "he" exists, so you already invented god as a "he" and if "he" doesn't exist because nature isn't "he" then god doesn't exist. Yes you are that irrational. Also, we can't prove shit about how we came about, we can't make life other than by fucking.
Derisively and facetious, not literally.
Yes literally otherwise you'd be openminded to my definition of god, instead you refuse to deviate from your belief of god as "he". As in a human male.
The pernicious Jewish political movement is not the same as not believing in divine entities.
It's rooted in the same perversion of reality.
Atheism just means I don't believe in your bs.
What's my BS? I already told you I don't believe in organized religion, yet you assume all sorts of things about my beliefs, which is asinine because you're completely off the mark regarding what I understand god to be. Your atheism is the source of your arrogance, mistaking your beliefs as the one true faith, your theory over experimental reality. You confuse the map in your mind for the actual terrain.
Ignorance is bliss.
Yet you indulge your own by believing you already have everything figured out. At least you live by your mantra.
So god is a he.
She, he, it. Why is everything literal with you people?
I flew down to the shops, I jumped over the fence. I'm not the .
Yes literally otherwise you'd be open-minded to my definition of god
I'm telling you to point blank I was mocking you and you still double down saying I'm laser-focused on deity gender, it is irrelevant.
Here is one, I have 4 tomatoes and 2 figs, how much fruit do I have?
Beep boop, USA considers tomatoes vegetables.
4 tomatoes, 2 figs, how many?
What kind of tomatoes?
4 tomatoes, 2 figs!
I don't like figs.
It's rooted in the same perversion of reality.
Time for you to do some reading bucko.
What's my BS?
Belief in eternal omniscient and omnipotent invisible beings, which you are requiring others to believing in sans any evidence as a means of gauging morality.
Yet you indulge your own by believing you already have everything figured out.
No, I have said it until I go blue in the face, no one knows it all nor have I claimed to have all the answers.
No one knows it all, but some people know more than others. Life is a game of discovery, only the religious fool thinks he has it all worked out, all the answers in one neat little package in a holy book, how convenient.
4 tomatoes and 2 figs, how much fruit do I have?
6, your favorite number.
Time for you to do some reading bucko.
Done more reading than I care to remember. Atheism is rooted in a perversion of reality.
I mention that you're fixated on god's gender to prove a point, you are defining god, and then claiming god doesn't exist when your arbitrary conditions aren't met. That's called a strawman, much like this statement of yours.
Belief in eternal omniscient and omnipotent invisible beings, which you are requiring others to believing in sans any evidence as a means of gauging morality.
No sir, I don't need you to believe in whatever perversion of god you've defined in your little brain, that's your problem, I don't judge you. You're free to believe anything you want, it is a sin to turn from god, it destroys you, which you're completely entitled to do. By all means, enjoy yourself.
No, I have said it until I go blue in the face, no one knows it all nor have I claimed to have all the answers.
You claim to know god, you have a good idea of what god is so you are qualified to judge whether god exists. You have a good definition, you just accept the hyperbolized version by corrupted organized religion, assuring yourself that is god, and with your smooth brain can strawman that notion into oblivion. Congratulations by negating a concept from organized religion you've disproven the existence of God. You're so smart!
No one knows it all, but some people know more than others. Life is a game of discovery, only the religious fool thinks he has it all worked out, all the answers in one neat little package in a holy book, how convenient.
And yet you think atheism isn't a religion. Ok, let me know when you decide to go full tranny or if you're just dabbling in atheism.
Atheism is rooted in a perversion of reality.
Only what can be observed, that doesn't not mean only viscerally.
Meanwhile, flights of fantasy and mythicism such as all religious practice are deeply rooted in exactly a perversion of reality.
You claim to know god, you have a good idea of what god is so you are qualified to judge whether god exists.
I make no such claims, I protest that there is no evidence to make me believe in the existence of god.
And yet you think atheism isn't a religion.
Who am I kidding, it is probably not the last time ill have to say this. Screenshot and tattoo it on your forehead next to fuckwit.
Atheism is the lack of belief in a deity.
There are no sermons, prohets, scripture, that is religion. Not believing in religion is not a religion onto itself. I don't prescribe to your beliefs not because I'm a rebel, or a punk, an agitator, an instigator, a rabble-rouser, to be argumentative. I don't believe because I find no proof that this assertion is true.
Look at it this way there are personal truths then there are objective truths. One is an opinion the other is factual. Your personal truth might be that a god gives you comfort and reassurance, fine. Objectively this is not true for everyone else, other people may follow different religions or none at all.
(post is archived)