my relaton with reaity is that i am a part of it.

i understand from descartes first principles that my understanding of the world is possibly inaccurate, and i strive to make mine the most accurate that i can.

i believe that science is the best epistemology.

do you mean i am rejecting reality?

im just following the scientific method as best i can

I dont know enough of christianity to defend it well here, I am not a christian, and so most of them will see anything I could possibly say in their defense as being insufficient.

But when I see the christians on here, I see brothers, allies with whom I share almost every perspective, I see good white men who wish to see that good white man do not perish from this Earth.

I see them love their religion as more of a stabilizing guideline that keeps order by establishing that there is a source of morality and purpose, the specifics of what morality come from this outside force has to be sensed rather than read about in some book, and that there are a few lowest common denominator parts of it that do not cause too much of a problem if read loosely and adhered to in what the person feels is a practical interpretation of them, as a literal interpretation is going to get some criticism from christians who bring up the practical issues with a direct interpretation.

The religion is, in my experience, shaped more by those who believe in it than by anything else, most of whom make very little reference to the bible because they skip over the parts that cause issues for them, the gentiles simply ignore the parts that harm them, and adhere to the good in their own way, which they feel like God would approve of. For them, religion is a source of community, a source of a sense of morality having an objective source, rather than as a source of any moral code beyond being a vague "do the right thing", and some generalized reference to the noahide laws of "dont kill, dont steal, etc". They also like the symbolism and ritual and traditions, which form so much of their culture and their identity. They keep christianity in their own way.

The origin of their belief system does not matter, nor do the teachings or commandments within them, they do not practice it as it was intended to be, and do not acknowledge any part of it that does not resonate with them. for them, God is pro-white and anti-jew, because they are, and therefore any religious beliefs can be compatible with any form of politics.

when you bring up troublesome parts of it, like the teachings of Jesus, you get practical responses, like how Christians would be wiped out if they were abided by by all Christians all the time, even though the Christian religion's adherents were never supposed to prioritize the continuation of their religion and it's people over following it's commandments (they should have merely preached as they were slaughtered), this proves that their heads are not so filled with God that all reason has not fallen out. If they are like this, then they are good.

Let them have their "deus vult" fantasies, it feels good to have your biases confirmed by the idea that the best champions of your political beliefs were people with some other important part of your identity in common with you.