WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] 1 pt (edited )

Read it. Are you referring to the "destroy religion" part of the protocols? Because if you are, I've got a few things to say on the matter.

  1. This was a lower step on the protocols after a bunch of other things had been done. Things such as removing the source of a pro-white secular philosophy and inserting themselves into a position of exploiting the vacuum created by a loss of religion to install an unchallenged anti-white philosophy that favors them and their agendas.

  2. The other thing religion did was provide a place for whites to meet up and talk in private, the steps above had ensured other avenues of private white communications were blocked off.

  3. The ideas of the jews are a religion, they have every element and characteristic of a religion, so you could argue that they are removing one religion to insert another, not irreligious atheism. There's no scientific method, just memorizing what you were told by rote by the designated authorities, like internalizing the proclamations from an imam. There's no critical thinking, only emotionally driven dogma from propaganda campaigns and ritual, like you get from worship. There's no connection to nature, only the worship of some idealized platonic form of man that is morally perfect, omnipotent, and omnipresent. Every single thing that you can find in Christianity you can find in Marxism.

  4. The protocols could have been intentionally leaked, so that we would read it, and our response to their plans could be anticipated. What's more, their plans could have changed over the years, or they could be imperfect and removing religion might end up hurting them rather than helping them.

  5. What of the atheists like me? What of us, who are on the far right, yet speak with strength knowledge and eloquence against the jew from that position? Are we not stronger for it, are words made more powerful to those who hear them? I'm pretty sure they weren't thinking of someone like me when they talked about atheism. They were expecting a marxist with a dead spirit, killing themselves with jew poison.

  6. Not done yet, but why do you let the enemy dictate what your thoughts and actions should be? You're suggestion here is "do the opposite of what the kike says he wants", it's like throwing the rabbit into the briar pit. You should instead focus on what's best for your people and what's worst for theirs, not building a plan around what they say (and know that you're hearing). It could be a trap, or a suboptimal move.

  7. If I ever do or say anything against the white race, start causing trouble here, or betray you to the jews, then you can count me as an enemy, until you see that, you should count me as an ally, you need all the allies you can get, and i know for certain that I'm not going to say anything against the white race, start causing trouble, or betray you, let alone to the heebs.