I'm an atheist. I see Christians and Atheists as the same: They think they know the truth, and that no good can come from a foundation of false knowledge, so they try to spread the truth. The problem is the way they do this, the real problem is not religion but dogmatic thinking. Good thinking is an open analysis of the facts, both submit to the evidence, it's a scientific approach to settling the score. Dogma is a different thing, instead of caring about how well their ideas correlate to the evidence of reality, they instead turn it into a matter of moral crusading, the other idea is not wrong as much as they are evil, even if they think the facts back the other side's beliefs, only evil can come out of a world that accepts them. Goodness and truth become enemies in the mind of the dogmatic, and they would love to propagate lies because they believe them to be requirements for goodness. This is false, of course, facts and opinions are separate, you can believe anything is true, and still be free to come to any opinion that you wish on it. There are Christians who fight against God, these are Infernalists, they accept all the facts of Christianity, God, Heaven, Jesus, hey believe in it all, and they come to the opposite position on what to do in response to it. Atheists can look at the facts revealed by science, and come to the position that fascism is the ideal political system. The problem with dogma is that it has the fully wrong idea of morality, the truth is irrelevant to them, and thus places like poal and /pol/ are full of atheists who advocate for christianity on the position that it is required for a moral society, they discuss things like rewriting the bible to make it more in line with their political views. There are christians who back them, who are okay with people pretending to believe, because they think it produces moral behavior, despite seeing people who they themselves had vetted as 100% champions of the true christianity turning out to be controlled opposition when they betray the white people to the jews. Christians on here are full of such stories of "white saviors" who were loved purely because of their level of devoutness to the Christian faith, it was thought that because they beleived all the right facts, that they would have all the right opinions. These are each a living example of the problem with the dogmatic mind. On the other hand, we got the atheist marxists, who are in every way religious, they have a religious structure and religious beliefs, they reject science, even though they claim to love it, what they love is pseudoscience. They arent atheists because they believe there is no god, but because they think believing in god produces what they see as being evil, they are very much like their christian counterparts in that way. Whether or not God exists, you can be fascist, I've seen you complain about atheists showing up to force their beliefs on you, but you are blind to the fact that you do the same to them, whenever you talk about atheists, you talk as if they are all some image you have of them in your mind, an evil group of society destroying monsters that all have the same political views, which are polar opposite to your own. You do this in this very post, you are no better than the atheists who do fit your descritpion. It's also a lie, most atheists arent on the left, and most christians arent on the right, I know this because I've been on the internet since 2008, and spent my time on the sites where moderation was lax, like 4chan, atheism was the most common position on these sites, and so was the political views of right-libertarianism to national socialism, the political preferences that would later come to define the dissident right. on the other hand, most christians you'd encounter in those days were entirely opposed to such politics, they were openly anti-racist and often very pro-jew, they were constantly talking about how atheism had a problem with nazis, they were right in that there were a lot of atheist nazis, but wrong in that this was a problem. it's a simple matter of bayesian analysis to find that am american leftist is more likely to be a christian than anything else, and that an atheist is more likely to not be a leftist. Even though being an atheist increases the chances of being leftist and being a christian decreases that chance. fascism is good because it produces good results, not because god likes it, and not because it can be derived from nature, the proof of fascism as a good policy is shown in the consequences that come from adopting it on those who live under it. Whether god exists or not, this doesnt change, and so the justification for being a fascist does not at all relate to religion, not one way or the other. Your insistence on fascism being what god wants divorces the argument from one of practicality, and indicates that you'd be happy in a failed state so long as it gets you in gods good graces. Keep in mind that germany was not just attacked by an atheist ussr, but also by a christian europe and christian america.