WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] 3 pts

That's not atheist logic. Atheist logic is "let's look at all of these religions from first principals by reading their texts and asking questions. It turns out they don't make a whole lot of sense and make a lot of contradictory claims and falsifiable claims. I choose not to believe this since it doesn't make sense. Well, it looks like none of the Gods of any of man's religions are real. Maybe God exists in some other form though I see no evidence for that either. I am open minded but these fools on earth can't even get passed their own religions so forget about having a deeper discussion with them. Don't get mad at me bro. Get mad at yourself. I am so bored."

[–] 1 pt

Pretty much this.

Just like in physics - you don't believe shit that has no verifiable proof. A book that humans wrote 2,000 years ago is as much proof as a picture of a tweet