Your point makes more sense now but I don’t think you’re being realistic about how it would play out. For sure, the day the power goes out, millions of plushy people aren’t going to move into the mountains and start killing their food.
Everyone in sparsely populated areas would thrive for awhile, everyone in the cities would fight and kill each other for whatever food and supplies remained in the area. Eventually the cities would be depleted and the few survivors would move to areas with more options for food, fighting and killing would continue until there were few enough people left alive to survive on what’s available.
There would be substantially fewer humans, but ecosystems balance out when every creature is [essentially] feral. The humans most likely to survive are the ones that started with the most bullets
"If I kill my neighbor, there will be more for me..."
That's a train of thought that isn't going to happen just in the cities, IMO
It's only for industrial farming if some 380 million people can be fed everyday, while I didn't do the math for wild animals, I bet it's far below that
Take france for instance, it's a big agricultural country
>France is the largest EU agri- cultural producer (23 percent of the value of EU-15 agricultural production), followed by Germany and Italy (both at about 15 percent), Spain (12 percent), United Kingdom (9 percent), and the Netherlands (7 percent).
Well with its own agricultural production alone, if memory serves, it can only feed around 40% of the population (65ish million)
So imagine with wild animals only...
Yeah I think we mostly agree with each other. Populations will decline rapidly everywhere whether the environment is rural, suburban, or urban just from neighbors killing each other for their supplies. I guess I’m just saying that far too few people will resort to hunting at the beginning for wildlife populations to be depleted too quickly to sustain whoever’s left; the ones who are actually capable of living off the land.
But still, you’ll have those communities that come together to sustain themselves and at the same time have the communities that come together to use their weapons to plunder the first ones. If you have enough ammunition to end up in the community that wins every fight, then there’s really no point in thinking about these scenarios as an excuse not to invest some spare cash into crypto, which is all I was saying at the beginning.
Saying don’t buy crypto because one day we might be living in the apocalypse is like saying don’t buy a couch because one day you might not be able to sit up anymore
As long as there's electricity crypto is a valid concept, and also as long as the gov doesn't deem it illegal like crack...
And the latter, depends only on the degree of .gov desperation
They confiscated the gold not so long ago, anything is possible when it comes to it
Use govcoin or get treated like a crack nigger...
(post is archived)