Everyone is Racist | Poal: Say what you want.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.

[–] • 2 pts

The world is so clown world now that you have to start out with a groundwork of pointing out that races of people are different. Actually, I would like to start with an individual focus. I used to study personality and human characteristics just because I thought it was interesting. There wasn't any information about groups except the occasional comparison between men and women. We're about to the point where we're obligated to pretend there's no difference there either. Anyway, people like to attribute things to the environment, to training and learning. However, there have been several studies of identical twins raised in separate households, and they always end up finding the twins are the most like each other, the second most like their biological parents, and the least like the people who raised them. The people involved will say things like, "I'm so neat and organized, because I learned it from the man who raised me." Then the other twin will say, "The man who raised me was such a mess, and I couldn't stand it. So in response to that, I became a neat freak."

For most personality research, the standard now is to use the Big Five system. It runs somewhat similar to the MBTI, but instead of category forcing (i.e. you're either this or that), the assumption is that you're most likely a moderate on any trait. If not moderate, then you are a little above or below average. I once read about the HEXACO model that adds one more trait that I think will be highly controversial. Each trait has been given 6 sub-traits to make it even clearer. I prefer the ENOAC order, so it runs somewhat similar with MBTI types. Four of the five traits have been correlated with MBTI dichotomies, but they are not always referring to the same thing. The traits are as follows:

Extroversion (MBTI correlate: E/I) - This involves interest in and involvement with people, physical and brain activity levels, assertiveness, and cheerfulness. People falsely attribute shyness to introverts, but that is not true. Real introverts tend to have a lack of interests in most people whereas extroverts find most people interesting and want to talk to them. They also like situations full of people engaging in what might be understood as a single event or activity. Extrovert brain activity is low whereas it is high for introverts. The result of this is that extroverts are more physically active and are also going about trying to gain stimulation from the environment. Extroverts also do better at defending themselves and standing up for themselves. They also tend to have a way of garnering social support or having this as a preexisting structure to defend themselves from social attacks. This is the only Big Five trait that represents a slow down of brain activity, and I personally think it should be introversion for that reason.

Neuroticism (MBTI: no correlation) - This is the house of all the negative emotions. The brain's negative emotion circuitry is separate from the positive that is associated with extroversion. Most traits of neuroticism work as an alarm system and the various sub-traits tend to oppose or strengthen other personality characteristics most of which you can figure out with common sense. Fear, shyness, self-consciousness, and the like tend to oppose most aspects of extroversion. Meanwhile, anger can strengthen assertiveness.

Openness/Intelligence (MBTI corrlate: N/S) - This includes not only brain power but an openness to new ideas and experiences and emotional openness. People with high openness tend to be more creative and like a wide range of media. I suppose some people have more of the openness without a lot of intelligence and some are narrow in focus but very intelligent. The anti-IQ agenda has been trying to separate intelligence from openness, but the two are strongly correlated with each other.

Agreeableness (MBTI correlate: F/T) - "Go along to get along" best defines this trait. People high in this are busy trying to accommodate others. Sometimes, though, the people lacking in this will break from a crowd and do what you might say is the right thing. People low in this trait are narcissistic and love to be in positions of power and leadership. They don't always make the best leaders, though.

Conscientiousness (MBTI correlate: J/P) - People with this trait are on time, on task, goal-directed, and organized. I have noticed that there can be a split in to where some people are only organized but off task and not on time and others are on task and on time but physically things are a disorganized mess. A lack of this trait is associated with higher creativity. Those who have high openness and lack this trait are the weirdest, most creative people.

Honesty/Morality (MBTI: no correlation) - This trait was added by the HEXACO model. These traits were generally attributed to conscientiousness or possibly agreeableness, but they really are a separate thing. You can have a highly dishonest and immoral person who is agreeable and conscientious. They will probably be busy using those traits to create and upright facade while actively be trying to con and defraud others.

Of the first five a study concluded that all of these traits were primarily determined by genetics with openness/intelligence being the most genetic and both agreeableness and conscientiousness being the least genetic. I have no information on the last trait since most studies do not include it.

Either studies exist or real world examples and common sense point to the fact that black and white people are at least 10 points different on average on all these traits and their sub-traits. Niggers are high in extroversion (also, why I recommend flipping it to introversion) and low in everything else. People often attribute nigger failure to a lack of intelligence, but sometimes it is a lack of conscientiousness that is responsible. I have read about niggers who couldn't use fertilizer now, because they couldn't make a small sacrifice for a much better future. This is an absurd lack of conscientiousness that I would have otherwise thought impossible. Rarely would you ever see a white or even other non-negro behaving like this. The nigger might understand that putting the shit on the crops makes them bigger, but he has no ability to seek a better future with a minor sacrifice and commitment now. Neuroticism can work to amplify most aspects of conscientiousness, but the nigger even lacks this trait. Sometimes conscientiousness can be imposed by an authority figure, but niggers tend to lack such individuals exerting pressure on them. Ultimately, nigger populations are a genetic disaster of simple, stupid, impulsive humanoids that are not suited to living in anything besides a jungle tribe.

The world is so clown world now that you have to start out with a groundwork of pointing out that races of people are different. Actually, I would like to start with an individual focus. I used to study personality and human characteristics just because I thought it was interesting. There wasn't any information about groups except the occasional comparison between men and women. We're about to the point where we're obligated to pretend there's no difference there either. Anyway, people like to attribute things to the environment, to training and learning. However, there have been several studies of identical twins raised in separate households, and they always end up finding the twins are the most like each other, the second most like their biological parents, and the least like the people who raised them. The people involved will say things like, "I'm so neat and organized, because I learned it from the man who raised me." Then the other twin will say, "The man who raised me was such a mess, and I couldn't stand it. So in response to that, I became a neat freak." For most personality research, the standard now is to use the Big Five system. It runs somewhat similar to the MBTI, but instead of category forcing (i.e. you're either this or that), the assumption is that you're most likely a moderate on any trait. If not moderate, then you are a little above or below average. I once read about the HEXACO model that adds one more trait that I think will be highly controversial. Each trait has been given 6 sub-traits to make it even clearer. I prefer the ENOAC order, so it runs somewhat similar with MBTI types. Four of the five traits have been correlated with MBTI dichotomies, but they are not always referring to the same thing. The traits are as follows: Extroversion (MBTI correlate: E/I) - This involves interest in and involvement with people, physical and brain activity levels, assertiveness, and cheerfulness. People falsely attribute shyness to introverts, but that is not true. Real introverts tend to have a lack of interests in most people whereas extroverts find most people interesting and want to talk to them. They also like situations full of people engaging in what might be understood as a single event or activity. Extrovert brain activity is low whereas it is high for introverts. The result of this is that extroverts are more physically active and are also going about trying to gain stimulation from the environment. Extroverts also do better at defending themselves and standing up for themselves. They also tend to have a way of garnering social support or having this as a preexisting structure to defend themselves from social attacks. This is the only Big Five trait that represents a slow down of brain activity, and I personally think it should be introversion for that reason. Neuroticism (MBTI: no correlation) - This is the house of all the negative emotions. The brain's negative emotion circuitry is separate from the positive that is associated with extroversion. Most traits of neuroticism work as an alarm system and the various sub-traits tend to oppose or strengthen other personality characteristics most of which you can figure out with common sense. Fear, shyness, self-consciousness, and the like tend to oppose most aspects of extroversion. Meanwhile, anger can strengthen assertiveness. Openness/Intelligence (MBTI corrlate: N/S) - This includes not only brain power but an openness to new ideas and experiences and emotional openness. People with high openness tend to be more creative and like a wide range of media. I suppose some people have more of the openness without a lot of intelligence and some are narrow in focus but very intelligent. The anti-IQ agenda has been trying to separate intelligence from openness, but the two are strongly correlated with each other. Agreeableness (MBTI correlate: F/T) - "Go along to get along" best defines this trait. People high in this are busy trying to accommodate others. Sometimes, though, the people lacking in this will break from a crowd and do what you might say is the right thing. People low in this trait are narcissistic and love to be in positions of power and leadership. They don't always make the best leaders, though. Conscientiousness (MBTI correlate: J/P) - People with this trait are on time, on task, goal-directed, and organized. I have noticed that there can be a split in to where some people are only organized but off task and not on time and others are on task and on time but physically things are a disorganized mess. A lack of this trait is associated with higher creativity. Those who have high openness and lack this trait are the weirdest, most creative people. Honesty/Morality (MBTI: no correlation) - This trait was added by the HEXACO model. These traits were generally attributed to conscientiousness or possibly agreeableness, but they really are a separate thing. You can have a highly dishonest and immoral person who is agreeable and conscientious. They will probably be busy using those traits to create and upright facade while actively be trying to con and defraud others. Of the first five a study concluded that all of these traits were primarily determined by genetics with openness/intelligence being the most genetic and both agreeableness and conscientiousness being the least genetic. I have no information on the last trait since most studies do not include it. Either studies exist or real world examples and common sense point to the fact that black and white people are at least 10 points different on average on all these traits and their sub-traits. Niggers are high in extroversion (also, why I recommend flipping it to introversion) and low in everything else. People often attribute nigger failure to a lack of intelligence, but sometimes it is a lack of conscientiousness that is responsible. I have read about niggers who couldn't use fertilizer now, because they couldn't make a small sacrifice for a much better future. This is an absurd lack of conscientiousness that I would have otherwise thought impossible. Rarely would you ever see a white or even other non-negro behaving like this. The nigger might understand that putting the shit on the crops makes them bigger, but he has no ability to seek a better future with a minor sacrifice and commitment now. Neuroticism can work to amplify most aspects of conscientiousness, but the nigger even lacks this trait. Sometimes conscientiousness can be imposed by an authority figure, but niggers tend to lack such individuals exerting pressure on them. Ultimately, nigger populations are a genetic disaster of simple, stupid, impulsive humanoids that are not suited to living in anything besides a jungle tribe.

link