![Cop Hit-and-Run [1242x1660 - 289KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/VBNkBG.png){kind=link}
Punishment should be swift, just, and befitting the crime. Tie the nigger to a post and let her be run over by a speeding truck.
But ... whom am I kidding? The kikes that rule us will give her a medal and no jail time for helping rid us of police.
As hilarious as that would be, I don't trust any jury well enough to give them powers of life and death.
Even when the evidence is this clear?
9 times out of 10, a death penalty is commuted to "white people pay until it dies" because some jew pilpul'd a hairline crack.
Even when the evidence is this clear?
Here's the problem, juries are only ever supposed to convict no matter what the crime or sentence when the evidence is "this clear," but that's not what happens in practice. They convict because papers said the guy is guilty, or some woman told a sob story or muh racism or some other shitty excuse for evidence.
If we create another tier of "super dooper guilty with cherries on top so it's ok to kill them" we're admitting that juries routinely convict people they're not sure are guilty at all. And they do.
(post is archived)