If they had a drug that was effective against covid for the general population then the vaccines would not be eligible for the EAU.
Weird. I heard that in New zealand. it is prescription only from the GP, and only for those who are already considered at enhanced risk, ie elderly or those with multiple comorbidities, and must have a confirmed diagnosis of Covid but is also needed to be taken within the first five days of infection and it is only effective for those with mild or moderate Covid. What exactly is the point ....
Remember that Dr Peter McCullough said that in numerous studies conducted around the world by doctors(who didn't give a shit about the insane FDA covid guidelines that say to do nothing until the patients get too sick), said that they reduced severe covid infection(by 80% I think), by treating their patients from early onset of flu/cold-like symptoms, boosting their immune systems with vitamins C+D+Zinc+zinc ionophore. Is plaxovid something new? What's in it?
...& what does this episode say about the general population at large? 80% of us have weakened immune systems. Kinda around the same % of the population that is prediabetic(but unaware of it).
edit: this story is nothing new though. Just a continuation of the silencing of docs who were disregarding FDA guidelines to do nothing about the covid, they were antagonized and demonized from the get go of this FDA covid insanity.
Oh yeah. They have tried to give themselves plausible deniability if and when plaxovid doesn't work by stating it should only b used for mild and moderate cases - therefore if you end up worse and in hospital after beginning the medication - you had severe covid and it's not the medication that didn't work. There is no point to taking this instead of existing C+D+Zinc+Zinc ionophores and other prophylactics (but simply no money in those).
Is plaxovid something new? What are the methods of action against virus if u take this med? Is it the same as the C+D+Zinc+zinc ionophore that the censored docs prescribed as prophylactic(early) treatment?
It’s a new antiviral and an aids medication.
This is revealing. The likely story was that all existing, off patent treatments were being suppressed to make way for patented products the big pharmaceutical companies would make billions from. Now we might be seeing a patented treatment being suppressed in favour of the vaccines.
If that is what is happening, the likely reason is that the powers that be want to keep the vaccines as a necessity so they can force everyone into the vaccine program.
The vaccine program is the start of a social credit system. It already has teeth. If you’re not in compliance you can be barred from entering public places, travelling, and even employment. Once everyone is in that program and used to it they can start revoking your status for other reasons, like things you said on social media.
I’ve noticed mainstream resistance to monoclonal antibodies in the US. The same reason could be behind that. It’s a one time treatment. You don’t need it unless you are severely ill. We don’t need to force everyone into a public program if we can simply treat the few who get sick.
Sounds like it’s expensive and they are rationing healthcare.
But let’s close down the world for this same group.
(post is archived)