![Trust the science [500x601 - 76KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/qCvWBr.jpg){kind=link}
If when you replicate the science, you get consistently different responses from that of the science presented, then the only conclusion you can come to is that the science presented was a lie from the start.
If you find that the science requires a level of investment beyond you to replicate it, even on a small scale, you should always question the science presented until such a time as you can indeed confirm it.
Science is never settled. THERE IS ALWAYS MORE TO LEARN. Consensus Is Not Science
>The late Michael Crichton, MD, author, film producer, put it this way: “I want to pause here and talk about this notion of consensus, and the rise of what has been called consensus science. I regard consensus science as an extremely pernicious development that ought to be stopped cold in its tracks. Historically, the claim of consensus has been the first refuge of scoundrels; it is a way to avoid debate by claiming that the matter is already settled. Whenever you hear the consensus of scientists agrees on something or other, reach for your wallet, because you’re being had.
(post is archived)