There are retards on both sides of the global warming skank fight and this is one of those arguments where the skanks who deny global warming prove their skankiness.
The inland glaciers in Greenland are sub-zero . Even if the temperature rose 1 or 2 degrees, it still wouldn't be enough to melt the glaciers and ice would still gain in those areas.
So, when you say "But muh Greenland glaciers!"... No fuck retard. Nobody but the skanks are talking about the Greenland glaciers. Go find Gretta Asberger and argue with her. That's where the skank fight is and that's where you belong.
The real argument involves sea ice and the ice shelves. And, as much as I hate the whole "Global Warming" thing, there is a real argument there which is worth while.
There are retards on both sides of the global warming skank fight and this is one of those arguments where the skanks who deny global warming prove their skankiness.
The inland glaciers in Greenland are sub-zero [ALL YEAR ROUND](https://tradingeconomics.com/greenland/temperature). Even if the temperature rose 1 or 2 degrees, it still wouldn't be enough to melt the glaciers and ice would still gain in those areas.
So, when you say *"But muh Greenland glaciers!"*... No fuck retard. Nobody but the skanks are talking about the Greenland glaciers. Go find Gretta Asberger and argue with her. That's where the skank fight is and that's where you belong.
The real argument involves sea ice and the ice shelves. And, as much as I hate the whole "Global Warming" thing, there is a real argument there which is worth while.
(post is archived)