WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

810

Fuck you, no one cares. Least of all the so-called "tech giants" that claim to be "climate friendly". Every single one of them gave up on being "carbon zero" the second GPT was launched and saw what it was doing.

Who would have thought, to get all of the companies off the "but muh climate change" bandwagon you just had to make a LLM that was actually useful (sometimes) then everyone went "oh fuck, burn the oil or we all go out of business".

Archive: https://archive.today/JoHWe

From the post:

>If you care about the environment, it can be hard to tell how you should feel about using AI models such as ChatGPT in your everyday life. The carbon cost of asking an artificial intelligence model a single text question can be measured in grams of CO2 — which is something like 0.0000001 percent of an average American’s annual carbon footprint. A query or two or 1,000 won’t make a huge dent over the course of a year. But those little costs start to add up when you multiply them across 1 billion people peppering AI models with requests for text, photos and videos. The data centers that host these models can devour more electricity than entire cities. Predictions about their rapid growth have pushed power companies to extend the lives of coal plants and build new natural gas plants. Keeping those computers cool uses freshwater — about one bottle’s worth for every 100 words of text ChatGPT generates.

Fuck you, no one cares. Least of all the so-called "tech giants" that claim to be "climate friendly". Every single one of them gave up on being "carbon zero" the second GPT was launched and saw what it was doing. Who would have thought, to get all of the companies off the "but muh climate change" bandwagon you just had to make a LLM that was actually useful (sometimes) then everyone went "oh fuck, burn the oil or we all go out of business". Archive: https://archive.today/JoHWe From the post: >>If you care about the environment, it can be hard to tell how you should feel about using AI models such as ChatGPT in your everyday life. The carbon cost of asking an artificial intelligence model a single text question can be measured in grams of CO2 — which is something like 0.0000001 percent of an average American’s annual carbon footprint. A query or two or 1,000 won’t make a huge dent over the course of a year. But those little costs start to add up when you multiply them across 1 billion people peppering AI models with requests for text, photos and videos. The data centers that host these models can devour more electricity than entire cities. Predictions about their rapid growth have pushed power companies to extend the lives of coal plants and build new natural gas plants. Keeping those computers cool uses freshwater — about one bottle’s worth for every 100 words of text ChatGPT generates.

(post is archived)

[–] 2 pts (edited )

Yea, MSN, fuck off you duplicitous piece of shit. I don't need you telling me how I should feel about anything.

When should I use AI?

When ever I want. It's there to use. In fact, I'm going to always use the most powerful and complex models that use the most energy, simply to say fuck you! Even when it doesn't matter. In fact, I'll now ask multiple AIs the same fucking questions. How's that? What would be hilarious would be to write an integration that forces multiple AIs to chat with each other non stop.

you’re better off using a search engine or going directly to a trusted website than asking an AI model

Wrong! It's better for you that I do that, not me. I don't want to waste my time hunting information down. That's what AI does well.

Bigger models gave more accurate answers but used several times more energy than smaller models.

And you know how much more energy larger models use because of what? Never mind, the question is rhetorical.

Oh, did I say fuck off?