WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.5K

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

I am surprised to see such trash published in Forbes. Perhaps you could write a letter to NASA telling them they made a mistake:

https://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/global-temperature/

[–] 1 pt

You didn't even read the article or you would have seen the link to the conference with a large panel of scientists.

That is one of the most interesting conclusions to come out of the seventh International Climate Change Conference sponsored by the Heartland Institute, held last week in Chicago. I attended, and served as one of the speakers, talking about The Economic Implications of High Cost Energy.

The conference featured serious natural science, contrary to the self-interested political science you hear from government financed global warming alarmists seeking to justify widely expanded regulatory and taxation powers for government bodies, or government body wannabees, such as the United Nations. See for yourself, as the conference speeches are online (http://climateconferences.heartland.org/iccc7/).

Once again you are dodging everything that doesn't fit your narrative.

[–] 1 pt

Did you read what you just quoted?

seventh International Climate Change Conference sponsored by the Heartland Institute

Notice my link to what the Heartland Institute is? That conference is a long-running joke. Just corporations propping up their profits by feeding bullshit to fools like you.

[–] 1 pt

Did you even watch the conference's video in the link I quoted?

I'm sure you didn't. You are in denial and refuse to admit your blind trust is fooling you.

http://climateconferences.heartland.org/iccc7/

Keep believing in kikes sponsored narrative and insult those who think differently, it won't change the facts that humans have close to no effect on earth's natural climate change.

[–] 1 pt

Oh wow.. I missed that the article is from 2012.

We are now living six years in the future, and can confirm that the sellouts and crackpots of this conference were :

I'm even more embarrassed for you now.

[–] 1 pt

Oh wow, another proof that you are quickly to judge and criticize different views without even reading properly.

No wonder why you are so delusional.

By the way, nothing has changed since and I'm still waiting for the sea level to rise.

[–] 1 pt

By the way, nothing has changed since and I'm still waiting for the sea level to rise.

We know exactly what has changed... the earth heated even more in agreement with anthropogenic global warming, proving that your headline is bullshit for fools. 2016 was the hottest year since 1880. It's hard to spell it out any more than that...

[–] 2 pts

Just out of curiousity, 1880 is a interesting choice of year, The longest running global temperature record started in 1850.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instrumental_temperature_record

So how can we be sure that there was not a hotter year before 1850? I'm not saying you are wrong but what I am saying is the data is far from complete.

In addition to that in the wikipedia article I linked it specifically says 1880 to 2012 in the total warming and trends section. I'm just saying that is quite interesting.

[–] 1 pt

It's useless to try to reason with you. You're stuck in your own delusion.

You should study more about the solar system to understand that what is happening is not related to human intervention, but more about how the earth is orbiting the sun (~25 000 years cycle).

I know you won't do your homework, simply because it will collapse your castle of delusion.