He seems to be pretty mediocre biologist, with an expertise in birds. The initial message about not automatically attributing everything to climate change is fair enough, especially if you can back up the specific points you're making with data. He's not a climate scientist - hence his ability to back up more general statements on climate change is weak or nonexistent. If you can find a list of his publications, please link them, because I'd like to see if he's competent enough to publish things - that's the basic measure of a scientist.
He seems to be pretty mediocre biologist
Yet another negative personal assumption.
I like how you automatically reject and belittle anything presented to you.
With all due respect, that person is certainly far more competent and experienced in that field than you are.
May I ask you where do you side on the political spectrum?
He seems to be pretty mediocre biologist
Yet another negative personal assumption.
He's at a , and I failed to find any publications. You can help me out by showing me what he has published. I think I was pretty generous, and the fact that I have to explain this to you shows your reasoning skills.
May I ask you where do you side on the political spectrum?
Well, what an unrelated question. Someone who didn't know you better might think you're one of those poor intellectually impoverished wretches who doesn't know what to think without identifying whether the person they're talking to is friend or foe by forcing their varied opinions onto a ridiculously simple linear classification.
Someone who didn't know you better might think you're one of those poor intellectually impoverished wretches
lol, yet another belittling.
Why are you triggered by such a simple question?
The reason is climate change is pushed by a political agenda and that's the reason why you try to create a diversion instead of replying.
Climate change is kikes subsidized scam.
(post is archived)