perhaps killing us is a worthwhile function.
Great, and how does that "clearly indicate" that I'm referring to killing "all humans"?
You know some of your dull mates think they're edgy for advocating getting rid of large amounts of people as a response to climate change: it's a dumb way to do things, one that would highlight just how stupid we are as a species. Still, I can't deny it would reduce environmental damage if we're really incapable of anything smarter.
For the record, I don't see much point in the preservation of nature without us around, it will rebound all on its own in a few million years. I want to maintain the paradise we've been given so future generations of people can enjoy it too.
Killing off niggers and Jews has nothing to do with the environment and all to do with preservation of ones own people. I am not a coward like others and openly state my support of genocide of certain groups of people. Go ahead and weasle your way out of your own words, you left it ambiguous enough that you can claim it was just a thought.
It was a little ambiguous. It says a lot about you that you'd choose the unlikely, most extreme option and deceive yourself into thinking that it must be that way.
(post is archived)