from the article:
“Global warming is now defined by the IPCC as a speculative 30-year global average temperature that is based, on one hand, on the observed global temperature data from the past 15 years and, on the other hand, on assumed global temperatures for the next 15 years. ”
One BIG problem – the IPCC has NEVER been correct about their modelled predictions (aka “projections”) of future global temperatures – they have never even been close, because their models all run much too hot.
In the vernacular, the IPCC can’t find it’s ass with both hands. These people are not at all credible – they are the Clowns of Climate.
Archived: http://picinfinity.co/d/dd5451a7-379e-4fed-95bb-39f3ddec7fd1.png
So does this mean you now know ? So you're going to stop embarrassing yourself by posting an article every time some god-forsaken spot on the globe has a rainy or cold day?
One BIG problem – the IPCC has NEVER been correct about their modelled predictions (aka “projections”) of future global temperatures – they have never even been close, because their models all run much too hot.
Liar. Have another look at despite your paid shills claims to the contrary.
Notice also how the dodgy bastard authoring this article splits the Hadcrut data into two graphs and chooses the vertical axis to try to minimise the warming trend.
Liar. Have another look at global temperatures continuing to increase despite your paid shills claims to the contrary.
projectiond is not responding and must be closed.
(post is archived)