This is cherrypicking taken to the extreme... just lazy pictures of outdated magazine covers - not even bothering to link to or source the articles.
You can pretty much present any argument you want by cherrypicking magazine covers - so long as your audience consists of unthinking fools.
so long as your audience consists of unthinking fools.
That's exactly what you are doing by posting articles from tabloids to push your snake oil propaganda.
"tabloids"... you're quite the comedian: comparing your stupid pictures with zero information and the dodgy blogs of climate shills to pretty much every factual scientific and media source.
The flat-earthers have a similar uphill battle with their own anti-science joke crusade - if only they had more money you'd have some great transferable skills.
to pretty much every 'factual' (((scientific))) and (((media source)))
Keep your blabla, no one wants to be black pilled by your kike promoted lies.
(post is archived)