I'm sure he does.. if he had a few more like me he could present a more convincing case for a "shill" invasion, probably implement some protective censorship just like voat.
probably implement some protective censorship just like voat.
You are very good at supposing things. Unfortunately for you they only exist in your reality. 😃
I expect the worst of you, and everyone else should too.
You have to right to parrot your delusion, people have the right to call you out. 😃
How much do you want to bet on it? Also why would I let that happen?
Well, Voat provides historical precedent and a view into the minds of users with ideologies like yours.
What would you do if you seriously thought the site was being heavily influenced in a professional way to promote certain ideas. I think there's already influence, but what if those ideas were ones that you don't relate to personally, or that are typically held by 'outsiders'. It wouldn't be easy to decide on a course of action.
Well if you mean professionally influenced as in vote manipulation or forum sliding I would deal with it but I can tell the difference, as long as users are not actively trying to censor each other well the narrative is what it is and the sub system exists for a reason. However I don’t think with my leadership it’ll be allowed to happen in a way where I will have to do it but if I do I’ll probably solve it with more transparency not less.
(post is archived)