Fox News: versus The Guardian:
The Independent:
New York Times:
Fox News: [Factual Reporting: MIXED](https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/fox-news/) versus The Guardian: [Factual Reporting: HIGH](https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-guardian/)
The Independent: [Factual Reporting: HIGH](https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-independent/)
New York Times: [Factual Reporting: HIGH](https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/new-york-times/)
mediabiasfactcheck
Do you even realize that you are using a shitty Snopes like biased pro-left website to confirm your fear-mongering propaganda? 😃
> mediabiasfactcheck
Do you even realize that you are using a shitty Snopes like biased pro-left website to confirm your fear-mongering propaganda? 😃
It's infinitely more credible than your unsourced propaganda pics, and the blog of that one climate shill you like. The Guardian can be trusted for high quality factual reporting - .
It's infinitely more credible than your unsourced propaganda pics, and the blog of that one climate shill you like. The Guardian can be trusted for high quality factual reporting - [you're still a lying turd](https://poal.co/s/Conservation/24825/9ff4d3a5-405b-441e-b10c-a4f13b3fbadc).
It's infinitely more credible
No, it's not. You only parrot a bunch of similar pro-leftist fear-mongering propaganda-ridden links, over and over, in hope people will believe you.
Plot Twist: they don't.
> It's infinitely more credible
No, it's not. You only parrot a bunch of similar pro-leftist fear-mongering propaganda-ridden links, over and over, in hope people will believe you.
Plot Twist: they don't.
(post is archived)