Not accepting other people’s opinions and preferring to check for myself is anti fact?
It's not that hard a concept: you cannot check for yourself - there's no time to check everything. You must rely on other people's opinions (real or imagined). All you have is a weak excuse for dismissing opinions you don't like.
What is my stance on climate change?
Your stance is soulless and political. It would be awkward for you to ever accept the science because you run this website, so you fence-sit with excuses about not having looked into it sufficiently. A reasonable person would trust the expertise of scientists to tell you what's happening with the climate, in the same way you trust their expertise to tell you the earth is round.
What is my stance on women’s sufferage?
Don't know, don't really care, but since you bring it up and you don't appear to hate women, I assume you're all for women voting. (This is not a question one needs to ask out in the real world.)
I know who you stomach as an admin, and now I know you ignore fact-checks like a flat-earther ignores science and engineering.
Well gotta say wrong on both fronts, not even close on climate change and nope on womens sufferage. Not to say I don’t think women should vote. However you don’t seem to care to have an actual discussion, in order to do that and win hearts and minds you would have to find out what others actually think before trying to sway their opinion. In order to change someone’s mind you must first understand what they have in it. I’d love for more people to support your cause but you are not going to get people to support it this way.
Well gotta say wrong on both fronts, not even close on climate change
You've told me your opinion on climate change in the past. If my recollection isn't even close, perhaps you were lying.
nope on womens sufferage. Not to say I don’t think women should vote.
Check a dictionary, and try that again.
(post is archived)