How do you reconcile animals eating other animals? A croc eating a dog? A bird eating a worm? A hawk eating a squirrel? Apolar bear eating a salmon, etc.?
Edit: typos
Animals don't comprehend morality, so I don't judge the morality of their actions.
If a retarded human didn't comprehend morality, I wouldn't judge the morality of his actions. Say a retard hits me, but he didn't comprehend that hitting people isn't good, can I justifiably be mad at him?
Edit: I don't know if "animals don't comprehend morality" is true. https://www.livescience.com/24802-animals-have-morals-book.html
So, for sake of argument, say they do. Vegans are against needless killing. These animals aren't needlessly killing.
Looks like a trait to me.
Does not eating things that comprehend morality sound good?
Only if they're cute.
What about creatures that don't comprehend morality? Say a retard doesn't comprehend morality, can I eat the retard?
Animals don't comprehend morality, so I don't judge the morality of their actions.
And there's the problem. You can't have a pact with something that does not understand what a pact is. If they are not going to hold up their end, even if it is because they are simply cannot, I have no obligation to pretend there is a pact.
Altruism is not self-interest.
If a retard can't enter this pact, does the NAP not apply to the retard?
(post is archived)