WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

992

> An appeals court said the woman’s decision not to have sex with her husband constituted a violation of the obligations of marriage, making her solely responsible for their divorce

> In 2019, an appeals court in Versailles found the woman, 66, to be solely at fault in her divorce from her husband.

> Its main grounds for this was the fact of her not having sex, as reported by her husband, which the court said constituted “a serious and repeated violation of the obligations of marriage, making the maintenance of a shared life intolerable” for him.

> The ruling was approved by the Cour de cassation – one of four courts of last appeal in France, with jurisdiction over civil and criminal matters.

> On March 17, two associations representing the woman said that she has now appealed to the ECHR to overturn the French ruling on the grounds of intrusion into her private life and violation of her physical integrity.

>> **An appeals court said the woman’s decision not to have sex with her husband constituted a violation of the obligations of marriage, making her solely responsible for their divorce** >> In 2019, an appeals court in Versailles found the woman, 66, to be solely at fault in her divorce from her husband. >> Its main grounds for this was the fact of her not having sex, as reported by her husband, which the court said constituted “a serious and repeated violation of the obligations of marriage, making the maintenance of a shared life intolerable” for him. >> The ruling was approved by the Cour de cassation – one of four courts of last appeal in France, with jurisdiction over civil and criminal matters. >> On March 17, two associations representing the woman said that she has now appealed to the ECHR to overturn the French ruling on the grounds of intrusion into her private life and violation of her physical integrity.

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

It's called constructive divorce in the US. It's a legitimate legal argument.

But... at 66? Hmmm.