We are having multiple discussions and questions. Let's start over, you go first....please answer my last few questions. Then ask your questions in the response and i'll answer.
lol, nonono, that's not how it works.
If you can answer that question, I'm sold.
It's as simple as that.
Look i'm the one trying to have a genuine debate here and you aren't being fair....
- How come we were able to go through the dangerous Van Allen Belt in a meth addicts tree fort in 1969 but can't venture there now?
- How fast do we have to go to reach "escape velocity, and how fast does the fastest plane we currently posses go?"
- How many decades will it take before you finally accept that the moon landings never happened? It's been 50 years now.
Answer these questions, then i'll answer yours and will enjoy this genuine and fun debate
You ask me to answer 3 questions when I ask you to answer only 1.
The Law of Density can't explain the escape velocity being the same no matter the flying object's mass. This model only works with gravity.
If you can't explain that, the other questions are irrelevant and a waste of time for both of us. (you probably already have been given answers that did not satisfy you).
(post is archived)