Gravity doesn't exist. There is "zero' (heh) evidence for it. The reason why objects fall is because of the LAW of Density and the reason why objects float is because of the LAW of Buoyancy, we don't need witchcraft inventions of "gravity" to explain these things. BTW Einstein fucked his Cousin Twice (E=MC2) literally fucked both his cousins--look it up.
It took me years to become a "Flat Realmist", it really did. I asked alot of questions, one of them being, why did it take the Space Shuttles 3 days to dock with the ISS but only 3 days to reach the moon in 1969? Weird thing to notice, which I did, and there was no logical answer.
Explain this then
Look boss, I know how this game works. I've argued enough about this subject to know when people are uncomfortable with cognitive dissonance. Why don't you explain why it took 3 days to only go 200 miles in the 2000's and only 3 days to go 200,000 miles with 1960's technology that was built to resemble a ?
Answer that and i'll explain the laws of buoyancy and density
lol I just did.
why did it take the Space Shuttles 3 days to dock with the ISS but only 3 days to reach the moon in 1969?
lol come on... You know the answer. It took around 27 hours for Crew2 to dock the ISS, because they almost look still relative to one another, they are actually orbiting the earth at 17,500mph.
Flying in an almost straight line (to rendez-vous with the moon) after getting slingshot by the earth is way easier than flying towards a the ISS at full speed. You don't want to crash on it. lol
The moon landing missions did NOT sling shot around the earth they first did a docking procedure (in "space") to the main rocket before launching (first time ever attempted mind you).
Again, if it was that easy in 1969 why did we lose the technology and can't go back after 50 years? lots of good questions and not good answers. Your responses to me are literally all the same questions I gave to "flat tards" and it became obvious that I was a moron and didn't know shit about the moon landings or space. So when the flat tards gave logical responses (like I just did) then I tried to refute them. I couldn't and felt even dumber. Like your "Sling shot to the moon" never happened mate.
Again, if it was that easy in 1969 why did we lose the technology and can't go back after 50 years? Why destroy it? lots of good questions and not good answers.
That's the exact same sentence repeated by moon landing deniers.
Gravity doesn't exist. The reason why objects fall is because of the LAW of Density and the reason why objects float is because of the LAW of Buoyancy,
Explain me how the escape velocity does not depend on the flying object's mass, but only on that of the earth.
Explain to me how NASA states we currently can't leave the Van Allen Belt because "it's too dangerous" yet we did it half a dozen times with meth tree house forts made out of tinfoil and cardboard? Literally, tin foil. Yet 50 years go by, technology advances with the ONE exception of space technology. Space technology goes back in time. Explain that one.
You are not answering my question.
Explain me how the escape velocity does not depend on the flying object's mass, but only on that of the earth.
The "LAW of Density" theory you've introduce in this discussion can't explain why the escape velocity on the earth is the same no matter the object's mass.
(post is archived)