Your stupid source already answered your stupid question with a non-answer;
lol please stop. You are cherry picking and intentionally omitted to highlight the important part:
A rocket, continuously accelerated by its exhaust
Now focus on the part the is in conflict with your Law of Density.
Once escape velocity is achieved, no further impulse need be applied for it to continue in its escape. In other words, if given escape velocity, the object will move away from the other body, continually slowing, and will asymptotically approach zero speed as the object's distance approaches infinity, never to come back
v_{e}={\sqrt {\frac {2GM}{r}}}
What is the equivalent formula for the Law of Density to explain escape velocity?
You are asking another question, before answering mine. Please humour me. In what year of our lord (blessed be his name) is it acceptable to you to finally re-land on the moon? Give me an estimate plus/minus 3 years. I'm guessing 2069 would be acceptable, but i'm not you, maybe you will say 2068 and surprise me
lol I think we're done here. You can't use your "Law of Density" to explain the escape velocity, which is totally normal.
I'm not the one deciding when the next manned Moon mission will happen, but according to NASA (and their new partnership with SpaceX) the estimation is around 2024. Time will tell.
Ok, we will have to revisit 2024 and when we never land back on the moon i'll ask you why?
Only to hear that niggers destroyed the space program
(post is archived)