![IRREFUTABLE PROOF OF FLAT EARTH [1200x1414 - 201KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/N7eCXV.jpg){kind=link}
Discworld...
Discworld...
Checkmate, globetards.
Checkmate, globetards.
OK I need a genius. With this new information now public and we can now see that space is now water.
So what is the visibility through water for light is it closer or farther than it appears. We can now figure out how far the stars really are also the sun and planets in our solar system also. This is a modern scientific breakthrough.
OK I need a genius. With this new information now public and we can now see that space is now water.
So what is the visibility through water for light is it closer or farther than it appears. We can now figure out how far the stars really are also the sun and planets in our solar system also. This is a modern scientific breakthrough.
Do people really believe the earth is flat?
Do people really believe the earth is flat?
I’m not sure, honestly. You’d have to be a paid shill or a retard to believe that. I mean, think about it: wouldn’t some faggot have found the edge of the earth by now and turned it into a tourist attraction? People would milk the shit out of that.
I’m not sure, honestly. You’d have to be a paid shill or a retard to believe that. I mean, think about it: wouldn’t some faggot have found the edge of the earth by now and turned it into a tourist attraction? People would milk the shit out of that.
I dunno man, it's fascinating.
I dunno man, it's fascinating.
There is no edge on an infinite plane.
There is no edge on an infinite plane.
You're replying to a FE shill.
You're replying to a FE shill.
Maybe I'm going backwards now?
Maybe I'm going backwards now?
You're not allowed to travel below the 60th parallel.
There is no "edge", just the ice wall of Antarctica holding in the oceans
You're not allowed to travel below the 60th parallel.
There is no "edge", just the ice wall of Antarctica holding in the oceans
You forgot "Artist Rendition - NASA" in tiny lettering from caption.
You forgot "Artist Rendition - NASA" in tiny lettering from caption.
Full disk images of earth exist. Claims to the contrary make flat-earth believers appear laughably ignorant.
https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/images/86257/an-epic-new-view-of-earth
Full disk images of earth exist. Claims to the contrary make flat-earth believers appear laughably ignorant.
https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/images/86257/an-epic-new-view-of-earth
Just another composite picture. A below quote from the image creator's website:
>EPIC takes a new picture every two hours, revealing how the planet would look to human eyes, capturing the ever-changing motion of clouds and weather systems and the fixed features of Earth such as deserts, forests and the distinct blues of different seas.
Lol, "would look to human eyes!" No dispute. By their own admission. Link to the
Now keep in mind NASA will say an image capture with a standard optical camera would be impossible in outer space. For example NASA is quick to say even an iphone capture would be considered a composite picture. However the same NASA would defend tooth and nail.... the Hasselblad 1970 Apollo 11 camera pics are real. Something is off my friend.
Just another composite picture. A below quote from the image creator's website:
>>EPIC takes a new picture every two hours, revealing how the planet would look to human eyes, capturing the ever-changing motion of clouds and weather systems and the fixed features of Earth such as deserts, forests and the distinct blues of different seas.
Lol, "would look to human eyes!" No dispute. By their own admission. Link to the [above.](https://www.nesdis.noaa.gov/content/dscovr-deep-space-climate-observatory)
Now keep in mind NASA will say an image capture with a standard optical camera would be impossible in outer space. For example NASA is quick to say even an iphone capture would be considered a composite picture. However the same NASA would defend tooth and nail.... the Hasselblad 1970 Apollo 11 camera pics are real. Something is off my friend.
The image above was made by combining information from EPIC’s red, green, and blue bands. (Bands are narrow regions of the electromagnetic spectrum to which a remote sensing instrument responds. When EPIC collects data, it takes a series of 10 images at different bands—from ultraviolet to near infrared.)
Full disk, composite is color channels only. Nice try though, Moshe.
>The image above was made by combining information from EPIC’s red, green, and blue bands. (Bands are narrow regions of the electromagnetic spectrum to which a remote sensing instrument responds. When EPIC collects data, it takes a series of 10 images at different bands—from ultraviolet to near infrared.)
Full disk, composite is color channels only. Nice try though, Moshe.
These are composites. "It is photoshopped, but it has to be" - Creator of the blue marble
These are composites. "It is photoshopped, but it has to be" - Creator of the blue marble
Yep I've heard him say it.
I also somewhat know Gene Kranz, the Apollo flight director who says the original info has been lost. He lives a few miles from me, been to his house.
I know several other NASA bigwigs for various reasons.
Yep I've heard him say it.
I also somewhat know Gene Kranz, the Apollo flight director who says the original info has been lost. He lives a few miles from me, been to his house.
I know several other NASA bigwigs for various reasons.
Image shows no stars in background, just like old moon landing photos. FTFA: "The EPIC team is developing data processing techniques..." In other words, digital tricks to give the people what they expect.
Explain now exactly where in space was the camera which took this photo. Out in deep space, but where in relation to the sun and earth? To get a sunny side photo means you are between the earth and the sun. So where in space was that space ship heading? Into the sun?
Image shows no stars in background, just like old moon landing photos.
FTFA: "The EPIC team is developing data processing techniques..." In other words, digital tricks to give the people what they expect.
Explain now exactly where in space was the camera which took this photo. Out in deep space, but where in relation to the sun and earth? To get a sunny side photo means you are between the earth and the sun. So where in space was that space ship heading? Into the sun?
Image shows no stars in the background
I believe that is due to dynamic range limitations of cameras. Did you know our eyes have a massive dynamic range of light sensitivity compared to film and digital cameras. Even “High Dynamic Range” tech which is new is only a small fraction of what our eyes can do. Exposing for the earth will black out the stars. Exposing for the stars will blow out the earth. The only way to get a daytime earth plus stars on camera is with compositing which is apparently a big no no for you flat earthers.
Explain now where in space this camera was
So you must not be familiar with rocket launches. They don’t just go straight up in the air on their way to the moon (at least not with a globe earth theory). Rather, the rocket moves away from earth in a sort of outward spiral motion. This means it is moving outward from earth, but also rotating around earth as a central axis. I’d get a gif showing what this looks like but I’m on my phone right now so it may be a bit. So the camera isn’t flying into the sun, but as it gets away from earth, it will pass between the earth and the sun multiple times until it reaches its escape velocity and its movement becomes a vector rather than an eliptical orbit. Does that make sense?
Ok I found a gif which shows a bit of what I’m talking about with rocket movement. Best I can do on mobile right now. https://imgur.com/TUkKuhf.gif
>Image shows no stars in the background
I believe that is due to dynamic range limitations of cameras. Did you know our eyes have a massive dynamic range of light sensitivity compared to film and digital cameras. Even “High Dynamic Range” tech which is new is only a small fraction of what our eyes can do. Exposing for the earth will black out the stars. Exposing for the stars will blow out the earth. The only way to get a daytime earth plus stars on camera is with compositing which is apparently a big no no for you flat earthers.
>Explain now where in space this camera was
So you must not be familiar with rocket launches. They don’t just go straight up in the air on their way to the moon (at least not with a globe earth theory). Rather, the rocket moves away from earth in a sort of outward spiral motion. This means it is moving outward from earth, but also rotating around earth as a central axis. I’d get a gif showing what this looks like but I’m on my phone right now so it may be a bit. So the camera isn’t flying into the sun, but as it gets away from earth, it will pass between the earth and the sun multiple times until it reaches its escape velocity and its movement becomes a vector rather than an eliptical orbit. Does that make sense?
Ok I found a gif which shows a bit of what I’m talking about with rocket movement. Best I can do on mobile right now. https://imgur.com/TUkKuhf.gif
The irrefutable proof surrounds you.
Feel free to quickly list all of the assumptions you have to make to explain away your perceptions.
I’ll wait.
The irrefutable proof surrounds you.
Feel free to quickly list all of the assumptions you have to make to explain away your perceptions.
I’ll wait.
Hey, globe-earth believer here. I’d like to know about lunar eclipses particularly in relation to how they are viewed from different points on earth, and also if you have time I am curious about day-and-night cycles. I’ve heard about spotlight theory but I was curious to know how spotlight theory works when we can observe other planets and the moon behaving under globular rotation from a non-directional light source that is the sun. Genuinely curious so thank you in advance.
Hey, globe-earth believer here. I’d like to know about lunar eclipses particularly in relation to how they are viewed from different points on earth, and also if you have time I am curious about day-and-night cycles. I’ve heard about spotlight theory but I was curious to know how spotlight theory works when we can observe other planets and the moon behaving under globular rotation from a non-directional light source that is the sun. Genuinely curious so thank you in advance.
I believe it’s entirely possible that the sun interacts with objects in the firmament. Are you familiar with the concept of the black sun?
As for planets, I’ve never seen convincing evidence not produced by nasa that they exist as terra firma.
I believe it’s entirely possible that the sun interacts with objects in the firmament. Are you familiar with the concept of the black sun?
As for planets, I’ve never seen convincing evidence not produced by nasa that they exist as terra firma.
I am not familiar with the black sun concept. Quick summary or a good rundown I can read somewhere?
What do you mean about planets not existing? You can literally see them from your back yard and photograph them through a telescope. Not trying to be dense, but I don’t understand what you mean by no convincing evidence.
I am not familiar with the black sun concept. Quick summary or a good rundown I can read somewhere?
What do you mean about planets not existing? You can literally see them from your back yard and photograph them through a telescope. Not trying to be dense, but I don’t understand what you mean by no convincing evidence.
That's convex.
That's convex.
I’m sorry for ever doubting your wisdom,
I’m sorry for ever doubting your wisdom, @Adaptordie
(post is archived)