![IRREFUTABLE PROOF OF FLAT EARTH [1200x1414 - 201KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/N7eCXV.jpg){kind=link}
Full disk images of earth exist. Claims to the contrary make flat-earth believers appear laughably ignorant.
https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/images/86257/an-epic-new-view-of-earth
Just another composite picture. A below quote from the image creator's website:
>EPIC takes a new picture every two hours, revealing how the planet would look to human eyes, capturing the ever-changing motion of clouds and weather systems and the fixed features of Earth such as deserts, forests and the distinct blues of different seas.
Lol, "would look to human eyes!" No dispute. By their own admission. Link to the
Now keep in mind NASA will say an image capture with a standard optical camera would be impossible in outer space. For example NASA is quick to say even an iphone capture would be considered a composite picture. However the same NASA would defend tooth and nail.... the Hasselblad 1970 Apollo 11 camera pics are real. Something is off my friend.
The image above was made by combining information from EPIC’s red, green, and blue bands. (Bands are narrow regions of the electromagnetic spectrum to which a remote sensing instrument responds. When EPIC collects data, it takes a series of 10 images at different bands—from ultraviolet to near infrared.)
Full disk, composite is color channels only. Nice try though, Moshe.
These are composites. "It is photoshopped, but it has to be" - Creator of the blue marble
Yep I've heard him say it.
I also somewhat know Gene Kranz, the Apollo flight director who says the original info has been lost. He lives a few miles from me, been to his house.
I know several other NASA bigwigs for various reasons.
Image shows no stars in background, just like old moon landing photos. FTFA: "The EPIC team is developing data processing techniques..." In other words, digital tricks to give the people what they expect.
Explain now exactly where in space was the camera which took this photo. Out in deep space, but where in relation to the sun and earth? To get a sunny side photo means you are between the earth and the sun. So where in space was that space ship heading? Into the sun?
Image shows no stars in the background
I believe that is due to dynamic range limitations of cameras. Did you know our eyes have a massive dynamic range of light sensitivity compared to film and digital cameras. Even “High Dynamic Range” tech which is new is only a small fraction of what our eyes can do. Exposing for the earth will black out the stars. Exposing for the stars will blow out the earth. The only way to get a daytime earth plus stars on camera is with compositing which is apparently a big no no for you flat earthers.
Explain now where in space this camera was
So you must not be familiar with rocket launches. They don’t just go straight up in the air on their way to the moon (at least not with a globe earth theory). Rather, the rocket moves away from earth in a sort of outward spiral motion. This means it is moving outward from earth, but also rotating around earth as a central axis. I’d get a gif showing what this looks like but I’m on my phone right now so it may be a bit. So the camera isn’t flying into the sun, but as it gets away from earth, it will pass between the earth and the sun multiple times until it reaches its escape velocity and its movement becomes a vector rather than an eliptical orbit. Does that make sense?
Ok I found a gif which shows a bit of what I’m talking about with rocket movement. Best I can do on mobile right now. https://imgur.com/TUkKuhf.gif
It is a photo rendition. I was a kid and watched the 'Apollo 11 show'. The earth looked retarded by I was just a kid, so what do I know. In the Internet Age, people followed up on it. I remember the footage in this video.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mCHG6uJH5L8
Everything from NASA is fake or fudged. Everything.
(post is archived)