WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.5K

And for bonus points, what generates the magnetic field/poles on flat Earth in the first place if there is no magnetic core inside a globe Earth.

And for bonus points, what generates the magnetic field/poles on flat Earth in the first place if there is no magnetic core inside a globe Earth.

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

Ironically globetardism is the religion here by any definition. All of your BELIEFS and yes they are beliefs because they’re based on anything but empirical observation, are handed down from on high and not demonstrable in any way.

Hahaha, you have it backwards. FE is entirely based on what other FE believers say it is. The models, mathematics and physics of FE are always extremely convoluted and incomplete. There is no elegance to the described mechanisms for simple things like the movement of the sun, moon and stars. I have never seen any practical experiment proposed by an FE believer that can be tested that doesn't have some fatal flaw to it yet the FE believer will argue the flaw exists on the other side. No FE believer can be convinced of the reality of the globe Earth because they are so against the idea of being aligned with NASA or the government that they will only believe the opposite of what they say.

FE people are the least open minded people I have ever met. You make hard core libtards look reasonable. I don't understand at all why you all choose to delude yourselves when presented with logical, testable observations. You are just like those who say "real communism has never been tried" even though there is tremendous evidence to show that communism is always a failure. Yeah, that's you guys. Now tell me again how you're not part of a religion?

BTW, I haven't copy-pasted any of my texts so your worn out attack from the FE flat-tard script has failed you. You can search my text to see that it was original and has no matching sources. I know you won't search it because you don't want to be proven wrong.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

No FE believer can be convinced of the reality of the globe Earth

Absolutely wrong, literally every single flat earther started out believing in the globe. Literally every one of us was convinced of the reality of the globe earth due to fake CGI images and incessant brainwashing. No one ever goes back to believing in the globe.

You think men walked on the moon in 1969, don’t you?

Also let’s hear a “practical experiment” that shows the earth is a spinning globe that couldn’t have any other possible conclusion.

[–] 1 pt

Yeah, keep doubling down on the "you're absolutely wrong because I say so!" rhetoric. No matter what practical experiment I propose, you will simply say that it is wrong. I've dealt with you FE believers for decades. If you knew how FE claims were 30 years ago, you would realize you're believing in bull shit. You've been suckered if you truly believe FE is real. It was a con back then and it's a jewish trick now. The jews tricked you. Deal with it.

Answer one more question: what would be the possible reason and benefit to lie about the Earth not being flat?

[–] 0 pt

I could reverse the question and ask, what would be the benefit of promoting a “lie” or “psyop” that the earth isn’t a globe.

You’re going to respond, something about how it makes other conspiracy theories look crazy by association. Which is just because you don’t believe it. If it’s not wrong, it’s not crazy. Also you can’t provide any evidence of it being a “trick” or anything else.

The actual question of “why” is interesting, of course there are many possible answers most of which are speculative. Obviously if you were a ruling power set on controlling every aspect of a population’s life, and not wanting them to have any connection to their creator, you might want to make them believe lies about where they live.

Again, it doesn’t really matter. You don’t have to know the motive to know you’re looking at a crime scene. All the evidence bears out a flat and motionless plane instead of a spinning globe in space, and there are proven lies involved in promoting the latter which call it entirely into question.

I could give you 200 proofs that the earth is a motionless plane and you can’t provide 1 proof that it’s a ball. Any “evidence” or observable phenomenon you could point to either relies on an unknowable assertion (the diameter of Venus for example) or could also “work” on a flat earth as well as a globe. I’m still waiting for proof.

Again, I’ll gladly debate this in a thread so people can judge for themselves.

Still won’t even admit to believing in the Apollo fairy tale?