I’m not even being snarky, I actually like the idea of that experiment. And it’s an example of something that is scientific knowledge — it’s repeatable, demonstrable, and knowable. . . Unlike claiming to know what the earth’s “core” is made of, which literally no one could know considering the deepest hole ever dug was like 8 miles deep.
Also, I’m not “claiming” anything. It is a fact that the most widely accepted flat earth models don’t have a South Pole.
It is a fact that the most widely accepted flat earth models
How is it a "fact" if there is more than one flat Earth model and those models can't even all agree on not having a south pole? That doesn't sound like "fact" at all.
Ok, let me rephrase that: NO flat earth model features a South Pole. If you go south, in the flat earth model, you are going away from the north “pole” in any and every direction outward.
There are different models with different nuances but we all agree that NASA is bullshit and all space missions are fake. The competing models are not at loggerheads; they just have subtle differences. If you stumble onto one that is dramatically different from the others, like the Flat Earth Society, it is controlled opposition.
He likes the idea of an experiment but will refuse all of them. Science repels him like a cross to a vampire.
(post is archived)