It would be more 'godlike' to create all things of nothing, exactly the way Genesis describes it. God 'spoke' things into existence. The big bang theory is an evolution theory, and fantasy. The point is to hide God from men. Do you accept big bang theory plus the existence of a divine creator? I guess that's plausible (I don't of course). Big Bang and the expanding universe imply that there is no absolute in creation, it implies infinity, and only God is infinite. There has to be an end to the universe, with expanding universe it implies there's no end to creation, no end to spinning and spinning. If things are created, there has to be a stopping point. All that used to confuse me to no end, including "the stars we see, what we're actually seeing is something billions of years in the past." A stationary and flat earth makes much better sense and aligns with the Bible (which one may or may not believe, I do). Look how the sun's traveling is described. 4 Their line is gone out through all the earth, and their words to the end of the world. In them hath he set a tabernacle for the sun, 5 Which is as a bridegroom coming out of his chamber, and rejoiceth as a strong man to run a race. 6 His going forth is from the end of the heaven, and his circuit unto the ends of it: and there is nothing hid from the heat thereof.