I'm no rocket surgeon, but some of the nasa stuff doesn't pass the smell test with me. Reading FE stuff is educational sometimes, except for when its not. Physics n whatnot.
Now answer my question
I would say #2 , but its prolly a trick question.
I have a couple questions if anyone cares to answer.
How does a flat earth model explain why Australian's can see the southern cross and Canadian's can't?
How does a flat earth model explain a lunar eclipse?
Was Admiral Bird trolling before trolling was a thing or was he smoking crack before crack was crack?
Why doesnt someone just fly over Antarctica with a film crew and put this to rest?
Currently I think I'm an Oblatespheroitard but on the weekends I tend to dress up as an arizmuthal equidistant map.
Not a trick question, but it does serve to bring up other questions about how the FE model works in relation to the time zones and daylight coverage during the summer equinox. Notice the dark spots on some time zones near the edge of the light spot. They are dark when they should be getting light at the summer equinox. Also notice the land masses opposite the spot, especially near the north pole. They are getting light when they shouldn't, at least in two of the pictures. This doesn't fit the observable effects of the summer equinox. FE model would need a non-circular spot light to make the observable effects work.
(post is archived)