![You wouldn't expect Google Fiber to be affected by solar activity. [1080x2400 - 252KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/Synb1c.jpg){kind=link}
What exactly are you claiming that I have said?
You are claiming that the outage is related to solar flare activity and that Google Fiber is having problems related to the AT&T outages. DownDetector says nothing at all about solar flares so you are using external information that you didn't provide here to try to connect solar flares to the Google Fiber issues.
Is that concise enough?
I've said nothing about it being solar flairs you dunce. In fact, I made a comment expressing explicitly that I am NOT saying it was solar flairs.
You are connecting my posts into the narrative you want me to be making. You're the one connecting the dots that arent connected.
To be clear, I think it is far more likely a problem at CISCO than anything else. I do not think this is a major problem at the moment, but sure, I do have suspicions of impending kikery, given how many hints the WEF et al have given about an impending cyber attack. Could this be a potential dry run? Maybe, maybe not.
Apologies if noticing things offends you.
I've said nothing about it being solar flairs you dunce. In fact, I made a comment expressing explicitly that I am NOT saying it was solar flairs.
From your post title:
You wouldn't expect Google Fiber to be affected by solar activity.
What solar activity are you referring to in your post title if you do not mean solar flares? Perhaps I interpreted your post incorrectly.
You are connecting my posts into the narrative you want me to be making. You're the one connecting the dots that arent connected.
Yes, I am correcting the narrative with reality and honesty. You've known me long enough here on Poal and Voat before to know that I get riled up whenever I see bad information being promoted in an area I have expertise in. I get rabid because I see people spreading inaccurate information that can be explained in other ways. The fact that DownDetector is being used as a tool of definitive proof gets me agitated because I know that DD is a poor choice of tools for such analyses. I'm being ascorbic because I want the facts to outweigh the fiction in this arena I have expertise in.
To be clear, I think it is far more likely a problem at CISCO than anything else. I do not think this is a major problem at the moment, but sure, I do have suspicions of impending kikery, given how many hints the WEF et al have given about an impending cyber attack. Could this be a potential dry run? Maybe, maybe not.
That's fair. We need to always be vigilant of the kikery that the WEF and their corporate minions can inflict on us for their own megalomaniacal reasons. I'm less concerned with these telecom issues today because they are more common than people know about. The real concern to watch is the cyberattack on Change Healthcare and Optum which is affecting the healthcare and insurance industries in a big way. It's affecting people getting prescriptions filled due to not being able to verify claim payments and also affecting surgeries and other treatment. This is a big concern but it's getting little to no coverage on any platform. That seems (((odd))).
Anyway, sorry for being rabid here, Theo. I just get a little crazy defending truth and reality when I know there is more to the story than is being presented.
We cool?
You're really going to argue with him? He's completely right. You are obviously suggesting that the Google outage thing is on par with Verizon or AT&T. It absolutely is not. The way you're wording the question also suggests that maybe there is something more going on than a solar flare. And maybe there is, but that's just speculation.
(post is archived)