Show me, in the constitution, where states can "pull back" their electoral college votes after they have been cast and the election decided. It isn't there, which means, specifically, it can't be done. Show me, in the constitution, a process where "de-certifying" a popular election can result in a withdraw of an electoral vote from 6 months prior. Show me any example of this in our history. You think this is the 1st time a loser felt cheated at the ballot box?
It isn't even reasonable. Oh, so, you decided, 6 months down the road, that you didn't like the outcome of your state's election, so you want to pull back the state's vote? And do what? Reverse the outcome of an election held 6 months ago? Reverse 6 months of legal processes? Reverse 6 months of law making, executive orders, military moves, diplomacy, etc.?
AZ sent delegates. The GOP from AZ also sent alternate delegates. Pence rejected the alternates and counted the votes cast by the AZ delegates. The AZ delegates were under no obligation to vote for Biden, but did, in fact, vote for Biden. The certification, or the later de-certification, of the AZ popular vote election doesn't have shit to do with the vote at the electoral college level. This has been decided before. This isn't new.
Its no different than the Bush decision at the SCOTUS. It doesn't matter if the state's politicos decide later that they voted wrong. The vote is over. Gore lost the only election that matters, the electoral college election. Yes, Gore probably won FL and should have been president, but the FL delegates, who are not bound by federal law to vote iaw state election results, voted for Bush, so Bush won.
You’re having a hard time following and your emotions are getting to you. Your first paragraph says exactly what I said. No where in the constitution is there guidance on how to resolve a fraudulent election that had domestic and foreign interference. Hence my comment “we are in unfamiliar territory”. It’s called a “constitutional crises” when you have a fraudulent and incapacitated civilian government.
You're projecting. Im not emotional. You're just retarded.
There is absolutely a process that prevents fraud from domestic and foreign interference and we went through that process, openly and accurately. You seem to not understand the whole purpose and point of the constitution or the electoral process.
Each state has an obligation to send delegates to the electoral college to vote. They did that. They voted. Thier votes were counted, by the sitting Vice President, accurately and correctly. No objections to the contrary were sustained. The delegates are not constitutionally obligated to vote iaw any state election or state vote. The delegates are not bound by any certification process. They are not constitutionally bound to vote iaw with state law. The delegates were under no duress. They voted for Biden, their votes were counted for Biden. Where's the constitutional crisis? The election was performed iaw the constitution. Your issue seems to be with how AZ performed their election, certification, and sending of delegates to vote the way AZ desires. That's a state issue and not a federal issue.
As for the state's election of delegates. There has been no fraud proven in court. No one is charged with commiting fraud. No indictments are publicly pending. Not even public accusations of named individuals suspected in fraud to be arrested. But even if there was fraud in the state's election, even if it was totally and completely rigged, it doesn't have shit to do with the constitution. The delegates were sent, they voted, their votes were counted, and Biden won.
This isn't new territory. This exact thing has been reviewed by the supreme court before. Sorry that the AZ delegates have vote remorse, but they voted and regret doesn't constitute fraud.
(post is archived)