On the other hand, to be the Devil's advocate for a moment, we all know that human rights do not need to be specified by governments, or allowed by governments. If one believes that abortion is a basic human right, it doesn't need to be specified in the Constitution to still be regarded as a right. It would be, however, a "human right" (in the judgment of liberals) not guaranteed in the Constitution. When you get right down to it, anyone can assert that anything is a human right. Who's to contradict them? What support do the recognized "human rights" have, other than the support and affirmation of the majority? Some guy named Ragnar Redbeard wrote a book titled *Might Is Right* in which he makes the case that the only human right is the right to use force to gain the things we want in life. We have the right to fight to survive or die. The assertion by the Founding Fathers that God had guaranteed the rights to "life, liberty and happiness" is very life-affirming and positive, but really, what is it sustained by, other than general affirmation? These are human rights only as long as we believe they are human rights.