WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.3K

(post is archived)

[–] 3 pts

That's 18 years from January 1, 1900. Commonly in database systems, when there is no date provided (null input), the database will default to a standard date set by the manufacturer. One of the most common default dates is 1/1/1900. Now take the default date and add 18 years to it to arrive at the minimum legal voting age. Yup, you get 1/1/1918. Do you see where this is going yet?

This isn't a smoking gun for vote fraud. This is a smoking gun for a poorly designed software system that is allowing the database to default to a null input date and assuming that the date of voter registration is 18 years from that date. What you are seeing here is a bunch of people who didn't have a birthdate and registration date recorded and the system is "guessing" to fill in the holes. Once again a complete lack of technical knowledge has led you to jump to conclusions. I have worked with this sort of stuff for so long that the default dates stick out like tranny in a girl's restroom. Do your own research on database null default dates and try not to fall for this shit again.

[–] 1 pt

like tranny in a girl's restroom

Lmao

[–] 0 pt

some of the issues I noticed were family members with the same name, which seems to be an American thing?

[–] 0 pt (edited )

You have to be a little surprised that half a million votes have “incomplete” data... especially since we have the advent of computers to scan and compute..

[–] 0 pt

No, I don't. You would be surprised by how much bad data floats around in various systems out there. It's way more common than people realize.

[–] 1 pt

So it sounds like we really need a ID to vote.