WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

870

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

Oh I do not envy the guys developing self driving cars that is an uphill battle if ive ever seen one. You proved to me that it’s incredibly complicated and it’s influenced the way I drive and now I just go “oh well it’s complicated” instead of “what is all these fucking idiots problems” it’s had a positive effect on my driving experience, as understanding often does with things. So thanks again.

[–] 0 pt

To optimize as an individual, aim for a pace where your speed remains fairly constant and where you have space around you so that your actions don't influence other people and other actions don't interfere with your driving.

All collisions are caused by people driving too fast for the conditions. Sometimes, the appropriate speed is zero.

Some people like to argue with that last one.

[–] 1 pt

This is how I tend to drive even before our interactions now I just allow for more distance and try to equalize it front and rear.(that’s what she said)

I would agree there are times when the appropriate speed is 0 however I also understand sometimes you gotta be somewhere. So I’ll move slow just not zero.

[–] 0 pt

If the appropriate speed is zero, it's not always your fault and driving carries inherent risk.

It isn't always you that's driving too fast for the conditions.

It also doesn't mean that speeding is the cause of collisions. Going faster is sometimes statistically safer. The emphasis is on the conditions. Many roads could easily increase their speed limits.

There is a long straight section (long for my area) where I could easily go 120 MPH without seriously increasing the probabilities of a collision. The view is exceptional and the sides of the highway are cut back quite a ways - meaning I'll have ample time to decelerate should something be at risk of entering the roadway. The posted speed limit is 45 MPH.

If there is an animal, reduced visibility, or a risk of something entering my path of travel - my appropriate speed is much lower.

The onus is actually on the traffic engineers to ensure the appropriate speed can be maintained.

Let's say your going down a feeder route in a subdivision. It's posted at, say, 15 MPH.

A dog darts out between the cars that line the roadway - and you can't stop in time, even though you're only going 15 MPH.

That's bad road design and pragmatically still needs to be traversed with a vehicle. You driving too fast for the conditions may not always be your fault - because you're forced to drive too fast for the conditions. They put you in a position where the appropriate speed might have been zero and then told you to drive through it.