WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

By summary in the OP, the people were the gold.

Precious metals also change in value, but their backing is physical. You could keep grain for value.

[–] 1 pt

I'm not sure that I could keep grain for value as grain is perishable.

The people being the gold does not make sense to me as gold's value comes from itself, in that it has to do nothing to be valuable. The people have to do something in order to be valuable, and if the people do less tomorrow than they did today then today's dollar is worth less tomorrow. It seems like people doing less over time would become something of an inevitability.

Also, wouldn't a covid-style lockdown completely destroy the National Socialist currency?

[–] 0 pt

How about cooking oil?

[–] 1 pt

My understanding of precious metals is that they work as currencies first because of their scarcity and second because humans increase their value because they find new uses for their rare properties (eg:silver's conductivity, gold's extreme corrosion resistance) as technology increases.

Cooking oil does not seem to have much scarcity to me, and its value might decrease with technology as innovations like air frying are cutting into the cooking oil market.

Gold is also easily transportable in usable quantities (coins) but would cooking oil be as easily transportable? Would it wind up being traded in paper IOUs instead, requiring a central regulating authority, like the commodities market currently is?

Although hoarding cooking oil would amusingly make me like The Simpsons' Groundskeeper Willie: "Ach! Muh Retirement Grease!"