So unless there is demand, you won't provide solutions. Have you ever tried something new ever in your life? How did the person who provided you with that new experience know your demand? How did anything come about that was new without there being the first one who tried something new and different?
I'm already aware the published papers with bibliography is a standard. In fact, 100% of the scientific community will reject any paper that is not properly cited. And if you can't even convince the intellectuals, good luck trying to convince the laypeople.
I already told you your cause didn't mean much to me, I was helping you with your cause, but you're ignorant to my criticism. I have done my part and yet you're resistant to change. Why should I bother even more with helping you by doing the work that you yourself is already motivated to do?
Cool. Keep on avoiding the question.
Ok I'll answer "your question" since you don't get inferences: I don't know.
What I do know is that you won't do a single thing after this, thus fulfilling the satisfaction of your tiny ego at the expense of not being able to effectively convince people to take up on your cause. Because I certainly wasn't.
I understand your inference just fine, the problem is that what you're asserting is worthless.
You've applied your value system of evidentiary integrity to a public of which a majority is too simple to follow, too busy to undertake, and too lazy to care. What's worse is that in your hubris you've lost touch with the common man, and are thus unable to connect with him whatsoever in any convincing manner. Even worse, you choose personal attacks as an effective route to get your point across...
It's not MY cause but that of the entire White race. You however, were never going to be an effective part of it anyway.
(post is archived)