WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

807

Copied -

Vlad the Impaler was not a "sick and depraved ruler.".. He was actually one of the greatest kings of what is now Romania! He ferociously fought against the Otoman Empire, defending the gate to Christian Europe. And there were many others: Mircea the Elder, Stefan the Great, Michael the Brave. Some of them. Maybe you guys should write an article about the defenders of Europe. For hudreds of years. A big part of history that is very little known. And if you want some Hollywood spice, in 1600, the otoman people used to scare their children using Mihai the Brave''s name :" behave, go to sleep, or lord Mihai will come!" And if the western Europe had sent their promised troops, to aid Mihai(when he had already reached Adrianopol) and had not betrayed him, it would have been a totally different course of history. Research on that. To return to this article, Yes, Vlad the Impaler is known for his executions "by impaling", but we are talking about the year circa 1450 and those were "performed" to the most dangerous people, to set an example. He didn't invent that practice, in fact, in those times, it was a quite common way of punishment. FYI, check out France, with Louis XVI. He was a fan of that procedure, and many other atrocities. Don't forget that in France, people were still being decapitated in 1977

Copied - Vlad the Impaler was not a "sick and depraved ruler.".. He was actually one of the greatest kings of what is now Romania! He ferociously fought against the Otoman Empire, defending the gate to Christian Europe. And there were many others: Mircea the Elder, Stefan the Great, Michael the Brave. Some of them. Maybe you guys should write an article about the defenders of Europe. For hudreds of years. A big part of history that is very little known. And if you want some Hollywood spice, in 1600, the otoman people used to scare their children using Mihai the Brave''s name :" behave, go to sleep, or lord Mihai will come!" And if the western Europe had sent their promised troops, to aid Mihai(when he had already reached Adrianopol) and had not betrayed him, it would have been a totally different course of history. Research on that. To return to this article, Yes, Vlad the Impaler is known for his executions "by impaling", but we are talking about the year circa 1450 and those were "performed" to the most dangerous people, to set an example. He didn't invent that practice, in fact, in those times, it was a quite common way of punishment. FYI, check out France, with Louis XVI. He was a fan of that procedure, and many other atrocities. Don't forget that in France, people were still being decapitated in 1977

(post is archived)

[–] 6 pts (edited )

Yes, I see it as a very brutal (and probably effective) form of military demoralization, with a huge psychological component. Imagine the effects on morale of seeing a few thousand of your kinsmen impaled on giant pikes. Of course, as psychological warfare it is fairly crude. More advanced psychological warfare techniques aim to plant the seeds of doubt in one's own cause. In this case, it's not as sophisticated. It's a pure fear tactic, but if done in large enough numbers it also becomes a kind of implied concentration of force.

They didn't have media or quick means of communication back then. In the 20th century you could drop a 50 megaton bomb. In the 15th century, you put people on pikes. Let's also not forget that Romania was dealing with Islamists here, whose militaristic violence formed the entire grounds for the spread of their politico-religious system. If you are trying to send a message to dogs, you send it in a way that the dog understands. It makes no sense to hold some diplomatic standard of ethics when you're dealing with a program like Islam, the currency of which has only ever been uncompromising barbarism.