WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.1K

(post is archived)

[–] 12 pts

The Romans lost their cohesiveness as a people. They lost their sense of purpose. They lost their religion. In part, it was the influx of strange foreign peoples and religious cults into Rome that did this to the Romans; and in part it was the loss of unity and purpose and faith by the Romans that allowed this influx of foreigners. There was a synergy involved.

We are seeing the same thing today in Western nations. The Jews are attacking and destroying our Christian culture; but they can only do this because we have become weak and divided, and allow them to do it instead of killing them all.

[–] 4 pts

Absolutely, and it is not only a change in philosophy but they want to alter and pollute the integrity of our blood. They are pushing miscegenation and downright mongrelization.

[–] 1 pt

The Romans lost their cohesiveness as a people. They lost their sense of purpose. They lost their religion. In part, it was the influx of strange foreign peoples and religious cults into Rome that did this to the Romans

And in that order. Loss of cohesion came first.

The Jews are attacking and destroying our Christian culture;

Abandon it. The whole reason the Jews created Christian culture in the first place is so they would have something to destroy once you were fully brainwashed by it.

Remember, you are White. Remember, your people are White. Remember, your Gods are White.

Heil Odin!

[–] 0 pt

Jews created Christian

100% true!

But "christianity" was NOT the original messianic message of the Bible. It was the jews that deliberately hellenized the text, translating it into Greek and literally altering the message.

[–] 0 pt

Gods dont exist and people know too much not to know that. A god and religion were created to explain the unexplanable, which is a rare thing nowadays. You can explain everything around you scientifically. We need to create a new-age religion based on core values, thoae dont change from christianity or any other religion. Values, community, thankfulness... Those are things we need as a group of ethnic whites to cherish ans value, not some invisible vikings in the sky.

[–] [deleted] 1 pt (edited )

We need a Heroic-Epic. A Heroic-Epic which is OURS. The Æsir are just flags we salute to pledge allegiance to our people and our purpose as a people.

You don't need to believe in the Gods to believe in what they represent. The Æsir represent the White-Race and our purpose, which is to create a future race of Übermensch.

No superstition required. No denial of science. Just an acknowledgement of your people. Where your people came from and where your people are going. This is our Heroic-Epic.

Heil Odin!

[–] 8 pts

The lesson here is that if you want to go conquering it is better to simply exterminate your defeated foes than to occupy and impose tribute. Imperialism leads to impurity, which leads to downfall.

If you try exterminating your neighbors without being significantly stronger, they will unite and exterminate you. Once you become significantly stronger, infighting begins and you are weak again.

[–] 2 pts

You don't exterminate anyone until you are strong enough. The Romans were strong enough but they chose to be merciful and collect tribute instead.

Destroying the backbone of your nation in the name of glory until you lose the ability to fight and have to placate your enemies in hope they don't destroy you is called "being merciful" now?

The problem is, you can't get "strong enough". All people have their personal aspirations, and dying on a battlefield isn't the most popular one. Once there's no external threat, people naturally switch to infighting.

[–] 1 pt (edited )

Precisely. Look at the Americas and how intermarrying worked out for them.

[–] 3 pts

Happened in Russia too, setting them up for lower class workers' (conquered nations) revolution.

[–] 4 pts

This author as well as the original cartoonist are SJW retards. North Africans were closely related to Caucasians. Syrians were closely related to Caucasians. They were certainly not niggers. Fucking morons.

[–] 0 pt

They were not niggers oftentimes but they weren't White, more middle eastern. I am not here to cause trouble but look at the southern Europeans they are darker and look like they have some semitic blood and even some African. Again I am not being mean. They are still for all intents and purposes considered White, the Mediterranean folks have been quite based against the jews in comparison to other nationalities and of all the women of European stock I actually find women that are of Mediterranean blood the most attractive.

Look at Lou Ferrigno in his younger years he looked middle eastern: https://popculthq.com/2015/03/11/lou-ferrigno-the-incredible-hulk-interview-life-of-a-hero/

Franco Columbu when he was very young he especially looked stereotypically non-White (He was from Sardinia): https://www.greatestphysiques.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Franco-no28.jpg

The actress in Il Postino is Sicilian but she is dark: https://www.oscarchamps.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/1995-Il-Postino-The-Postman-06.jpg

Kourtney Kardashian (yes yes I know) is Armenian heritage but is dark: https://theskincareedit.com/kourtney-kardashian-before-and-after

And I have met my fair share of Greeks who are dark and don't look White.

[–] 3 pts

I agree with you actually. North Africans, Southwest Asians, Greeks, southern Italians, can be quite a bit darker than Northern Euros, but they are all still part of the Caucosoid family - all still somewhat closely related. https://archive.org/download/major-human-races-tree/major-human-races-tree.png My big issue with the article is that the author seems to think North Africans and Southwestern Asians are black (as in sub Saharan Africans) when they are really just dark Caucosoids. It's just frustrating seeing that part of the world get "blackwashed". Kinda like how Othello is always played by a black guy when he was a Berber.

[–] 0 pt

Yes I have noticed the blackwashing and niggas believe it all day.

[–] [deleted] 2 pts
[–] 1 pt

Mary Beard has faced ‘unnecessary insult, misogyny and language of war’ for defending the BBC cartoon.

LANGUAGE OF WAAAAARRRRRRR, EVERYONE!!!!!

What is that, the left's term for hate speech turned up to 2000? What a ridiculous thing to say when people disagree with you - "language of war."

[–] 0 pt

Same as Trump's alleged "incitement of violence." They have creative words don't they?

[–] 1 pt

It's not surprising that liberals suffer from this delusion - it permeates their thinking on every topic. No matter whether we're talking about minimum wage, college educations, or immigration, liberals cannot understand that the very source of a thing's value derives from its unequal distribution. In other words, the more scarce a thing is in relation to the demand for it, the more it's worth. A college education used to command a large salary premium because there weren't as many college graduates as there was demand for them. Now there is a glut of college graduates and they're not worth as much. If 100% of people receive a college education, it will have no economic value whatsoever.

The same holds true for the supply of low-skilled labor. It's astoundingly stupid of liberals to support open borders and bemoan the plight of poor people at the same time. They're literally driving the value of jobs into the ground with their ideology and then complaining about it as if someone else is responsible. If they really wanted jobs to pay more they would know closing the immigration spigot would have that result immediately.

[–] 0 pt

Exactly. They want all of these wonderful things in regards to payments, gibs, etc for the poor but then hurt the poor with open borders of cheap labor. Also remember college was much more demanding back then for only the top 10-15% on the IQ scale. But the lowered the standards, dumbed down the curriculum and let virtually anyone in. Employers are politically correct but they know what's up and realized that the quality product coming out college was not the same.

[–] 1 pt

Brother-in-law's girlfriend is a college grad lab technician. Last Christmas the two of them were reminiscing on their shared 100 level chemistry class and she mentioned how the tests were curved so much that she remembers getting a "B" with a score of 64%. I jested "you can get a degree with scores like that, huh?". "Yep!"

Imagine, hospital lab techs with a tenuous, at best, grasp on chemistry. And people wonder why I don't trust (((modern medicine))).

[–] 0 pt

Yes, certain college courses/ majors graded on a curve.

[–] 0 pt

That's another bullshit article you posted. Whoever wrote that wasn't at all familiar with anthropological history. North Africa (especially prior to the muslim takeover) does not equal black sub saharan african, who have 80k years separation from real humans.

[–] 0 pt

North Africa is/was semitic/middle eastern, they are not black I agree.

[–] 0 pt

They are now. Look at the Egyptians- White as a sheet. r1b haplogroup was from Northern Europe. We think of the Berber population of N.Africa as 'semitic' because of the mass migration/ islamic conquest.

[–] 0 pt

Well, the Moors to my knowledge were swarthy people. They might have been semitic but I am not sure if I would classify them as White. Many people from southern Spain are dark....many of them have Moorish and jewish blood. Look At Julio Iglesias, the guy is a swarthy jew, the guy is a freaking practicing rabbi!