![“If You Don’t Come Up Again, Goldstein,” From Life, December 21, 1899 [921x634 - 79KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/YZrDPv.jpg){kind=link}
They were talking about diamonds as wealth in 1905, at a time when diamonds didn't have industrial, commercial, or commodity value.
As a matter of fact, only jews found diamonds interesting at the time, but the problem was that diamonds didn't have any value at the time. They didn't have commodity value until (((Edward Bernays'))) ~40 years later. Industrial use for diamonds followed even later, in the mid 1950s.
Again, The Clansman was written in 1905, long before diamonds had any value to anyone except jews (of which, they admit a millenia-long love affair with diamonds). That's why the passage had to be misdirected to Darwin - it confuses the whole matter.
Yeah, I know all about De Beers, Edward Bernays and how they made said industry out of nothing. So you're saying that they were already planning, at the time, to introduce diamonds in the markets as a way to fleece goyim— and that the author "oopsied" in a moment of hubristic prose? Or that said book was actually written much-later than stated, and this dating-detail was overlooked by the editor? I guess I just don't see how them lying about diamonds has to do with racial loyalty. What narrative did they change, and to what? That jews aren't entirely forthright about their motives? That the book is/was a jewish-racial-cohesion-motivator? Pardon my autism.
- Edward Bernays is responsible for so much more, by the way. I don't know what you do or don't know, but he is why women wear bras, why we eat eggs/bacon/orange juice for breakfast, why women smoked back then, and caused velvet to make a resurgence twice. The list of what this old WW2 propagandist did in peacetime is endless.
- I'm providing information for you to make a reasoned conclusion - not drawing conclusions for you. In short, most of our tells that something is a controlled op is because the author outs himself as jewish in ways they don't comprehend at the time. This could be, e.g., drawing serifs on swastikas, obsession with poop/fecal matters/bodily fluids, or, in this case, implying that great wealth lies in diamonds when nobody considered diamonds valuable.
The immediate next thought should be 'why would jews pretend to be their opposition?' To this, I believe the answer is 'to foster racial loyalty in their own; to create the boogeyman that White men largely weren't/aren't'. Remember that they were having problems with their own selling them out at the time (e.g. (((Benjamin Freedman))), one of my favorites).
(post is archived)