> I'd buy you a beer. I quit drinking about a year or two ago. Actually I have a theory about that too. I think that like toxoplasma gondii, saccharomyces cerevisiae is essentially a parasite that has programmed humans to take care of it. I suppose my dog is a parasite too but he’s cuter than a beer and doesn’t make me fat. You can imagine how much fun I am at parties. I think it is very likely that homosexuality is caused by multiple conditions — perhaps too much soy isoflavones or other pseudo-estrogens from plastics or herbicides are a factor causing female “circuitry” to switch on in males. All LGBTs don’t behave alike obviously. It just doesn’t seem like one condition. But I think that there are some homos, especially trannies, that are so mentally unstable, reckless, even violent. They are incredibly promiscuous and they are sexually atypical in other ways— they have multiple kinks like furries or S&M. It is almost as if they are sexually perverse rather than just gay. This reminds me of the rodents infected with toxoplasmosis (as mentioned in the link from the Evo and Proud blog.) If a pathogen could reprogram your brain to be a promiscuous ass pirate it could spread itself very efficiently. No one spreads STDs better than gay men as evidenced by AIDS. If a pathogen could infect young boys, so much the better for the pathogen. Theres an infectious fungus called fusarium that can infect your brain and it happens to produces a*phytoestrogen*. It could effect brain development. It also occurs alot in sheep which coincidentally have a high rate of homo among animals. >it's also a symptom of socialism/city life I think this is another good argument for pathogenic homo. High population density makes it easier for a contagious pathogen to spread. High density cities are riddled with homos and there are pretty few out in the country. If you look at some societies like ancient Greek city-states, an endemic pathogen spread in a high population density environment could be an explanation. Other populations like the Khoisan dont seem to have any homosexuality at all. Remember that this theoretical pathogen could effect mice as well. I don’t buy the whole shoot-your-load-at-any-potential-target theory because most male gays seem to have a *distinct* preference for men and hardly ever reproduce. This theory also doesnt explain trannies. I really think some of these people act brain damaged because I think that they are. Imagine if we could cure or prevent 50% of all gays with an antibiotic or an antifungal. >They have a strategy and it's always the same going back to fucking Rome. Try 2000 years before that. Have you heard of the hyksos? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyksos These were semitic invaders of Egypt in the late bronze/early iron age. Archeologically established event widely assumed to be the basis of the book of Exodus. Except the Egyptian side of the story, supported by evidence, is that the Hyksos were not enslaved by Egypt— they migrated into and infiltrated Egyptian society until they gained sufficient political power and then they took over the northern half of Egypt and ruled it for 3 centuries. It seems that they were initially peaceful and law abiding and occupied some postitions within the pharoanic bureacracy. The Egyptians waged several wars to throw them out of northern Egypt. So they were not slaves. *And* they made up a myth about the event that paints them as victims when they were clearly aggressors. When I read about this episode, which turns Exodus on it’s head, I realized— * these folks are genetically programmed to infiltrate slowly and take over when they reach critical mass, and that that program was well in place by ~1200 BC * this event establishes a pattern not just for a slow infiltration by subterfuge, but also a lack of awareness of the population to perceive their own predatory nature and even a predispostition to paint themselves as the victim when they are clearly the aggressor and to propagandize that victimhood. The book of Exodus and the holohoax are due to the same gene— mafia hypothesis. Most people think Im way out there with this shit. But I feel like it is a highly likely explanation. I see some similar behavior with the gypsies and the irish travellers— claiming to be victims as they predate on other groups. I also see some of the same sort of thinking in the SJW school of psychology: predatory/parasitic personalities cultivating a victim identity in order to justify exploitation of more functional productive members of society. I assume this trend is greatly driven by the high number of jews in psychology. Jews have a few “memes” which they update occassionally to exploit or take over some new society. But the pattern is the same for around 3 or 4 thousand years. I think that there are some non-jews in the caucasian population that have some of these parasitic traits but in much lower frequency. Jews however have these traits and a few others in very high frequency because of the traits of their founding population (intelligent manipulative priests) and that the jews that dont have many traits that suit the jewish strategy probably drop out and assimilate in to the host society all the time, so what is left is a concentration of a set of highly interesting genes. I also think they regularly acquire new blood — look at the Clintons, they just recruited. I think their genes do scatter as some assimilate into gentile society and that could also explain *a few* rather machiavellian gentiles in our midst. The jewish religion is sort of like a breeding program for machiavellian or parasitic traits, but jews or people with jewish genes dont have to be practicing jews to be social parasites. The only way to thwart them is to identify the genes in question and test for them. TLDR I believe they are literally social parasites per the definition in evolution. They are literally a 100% perfect fit.