As an ex-subscriber, it really depends on expectations. If you want raw stories of what's documented and part of mainstream, things can be learned. But he only pushes the official narrative. Period. As an example, he did a video on Patton and proceeded to state anyone who believes he was assassinated is ignorant and there is no basis to believe otherwise. He then ignored all the facts which are contrary to his statement. Several commenters who know the details called him out on it. Some comments were deleted. I unsubscribed. Does this have to mean he's controlled opposition? No. But it means he will always pull the official narrative and speak out against or ignore well documented facts when they go against the official narrative. Which for me means a chance of indoctrination or reinforcement of official propaganda. There's a German guy who has a channel who speaks to tactics, statistics, numbers, equipment, and tries to put these things into context. No politics. While very dry it does provide a deeper understanding as to why things were done and what it really means.