Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

On September 19th, 1918 the Germans sent along the following message to the US Secretary of State:

"The German Government protests against the use of shotguns by the American Army and calls attention to the fact that according to the laws of war, every prisoner found to have in his possession such guns or ammunition belonging thereto forfeits his life. This protest is based upon article 23(e) of the Hague convention respecting the laws and customs of war on land. Reply by cable is required before October 1, 1918"

The quote from article 23(e) is a prohibition of "...arms, projectiles, or material calculated to cause unnecessary suffering..."

US Soldiers appeared to be aware of this note shortly after as there are accounts from officers saying they warned their men not to be caught with the gun in hand when surrendering.

Acting Judge Advocate General Samuel T. Ansell reviewed the matter and issued a lengthy opinion. The crux of his findings were centered on a simple comparison between the shotgun's blast and a shrapnel shell's burst. Both meant not to maim, but to kill multiple targets at once.

So the US would send back their own message. Basically "Do it and we'll begin reprisals."

The firm response must have worked because there are no documented executions of US soldiers for being armed with shotguns.

Now, the "why" of German disapproval is difficult. Their propaganda machine was set to work against the incoming Americans and would accuse them of being savage, tomahawk-wielding brutes with no respect for civilized warfare.

On September 19th, 1918 the Germans sent along the following message to the US Secretary of State: "The German Government protests against the use of shotguns by the American Army and calls attention to the fact that according to the laws of war, every prisoner found to have in his possession such guns or ammunition belonging thereto forfeits his life. This protest is based upon article 23(e) of the Hague convention respecting the laws and customs of war on land. Reply by cable is required before October 1, 1918" The quote from article 23(e) is a prohibition of "...arms, projectiles, or material calculated to cause unnecessary suffering..." US Soldiers appeared to be aware of this note shortly after as there are accounts from officers saying they warned their men not to be caught with the gun in hand when surrendering. Acting Judge Advocate General Samuel T. Ansell reviewed the matter and issued a lengthy opinion. The crux of his findings were centered on a simple comparison between the shotgun's blast and a shrapnel shell's burst. Both meant not to maim, but to kill multiple targets at once. So the US would send back their own message. Basically "Do it and we'll begin reprisals." The firm response must have worked because there are no documented executions of US soldiers for being armed with shotguns. Now, the "why" of German disapproval is difficult. Their propaganda machine was set to work against the incoming Americans and would accuse them of being savage, tomahawk-wielding brutes with no respect for civilized warfare.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (10).
[–] • 3 pts

Good job american faggot soliders fighting against germany in the world wars and securing earth for the globalist jews to destroy and oppress. /s

America has been the "bad guys" for a long time now.