29 Japanese planes were shot down over Oahu. Did they get 29 jap planes from China, ship them in, and transport them to staged crash sites without witnesses or any one involved spilling the beans? How did they get the thousands of eyewitnesses and hundreds of Japanese pilots to lie about what they saw?
Was the entire fucking island of Hawaii and the entire fucking Japanese attack fleet in on the scam?
29 Japanese planes were shot down
Precisely. That is what is alleged. Where are those planes? Not a single one was preserved for the museum or for historical purposes. Nothing but a couple of nuts and bolts left of them. Doesn't that seem strange?
No new wrecks discovered in the waters surrounding, even though they keep turning up elsewhere in the Pacific.
A single plane, well-preserved would serve as proof of a Japanese presence on the island. It would be hard to fake since they'd have to make serial numbers and such match up. But they didn't attempt that at all.
Was the entire fucking island of Hawaii and the entire fucking Japanese attack fleet in on the scam?
It is well-known in Hawaii that the Pearl Harbor attack was a false-flag attack. Not so in the rest of the world.
I'm not sure what the Japanese attack fleet has got to do with this, except that they're being blamed for an attack that they never took part in.
"That is what is alleged. "
And its fucking bullshit.
Was everyone involved in this story lying to?
https://www.historynet.com/the-niihau-incident.htm
"Not a single one was preserved for the museum or for historical purposes"
https://www.pearlharboraviationmuseum.org/experiences/hangar-37/
That museum has one of only TWO Nakajima B5N's that appear in any museum. The Japanese produced thousands of them. Now does the fact that only two of those planes appear in a museum mean that the war didn't happen? The Japanese Zero was the most famous plane of the war. 10,000 were built. Zeros only appear in two US museums - National Museum of the United States Air Force and at the Pacific Aviation Museum. Again the "proof" is so scant does that mean the war didn't happen?
"It is well-known in Hawaii that the Pearl Harbor attack was a false-flag attack. "
Yeah, well no fucking shit. This is the reason why -
https://enjoyingthejourney.blogspot.com/2008/12/nov-30-1941-honolulu-headline-japanese.html
It was a false flag in that the attack was no suprise and that the FDR Regime engineered the attack. Find me one fucking Hawaiian that was there at Pearl that day saying there was no attack at all.
"I'm not sure what the Japanese attack fleet has got to do with this"
Because the pilots and sailors talked about their part in the attack! How did the US government get them to lie? How did the US government get thousands of US sailors and soldiers and all the citizens to lie about it?
The Niihau incident is also addressed in the PDF. The earliest public information about the Niihau incident seems to date to the 1950's. The story is completely incongruent with itself. It centers around the pilot having some secret documents that he wants to keep hidden from the locals.
Does it make sense to go on a combat mission over enemy territory carrying secret documents? It doesn't, not in the least. Much of the story would be congruent with an espionage mission carried by the Japanese to spy on Hawaii, but it doesn't fit the notion of a combat mission.
Another unlikely element of the NIi'hau story is that the Japanese didn't know that the island was populated, so they had chosen to land on it if they couldn't make it to the carrier. If so, Japanese intelligence was so stupid they didn't even bother to read the 1911 encyclopedia Britanica entry for the island.
Therefore, the Ni'ihau incident appears to be fabricated.
Regarding the Nakajima B5N. The museum's indicates that that this type of aircraft was supposedly used at the Pearl Harbor attack, but no details about the aircraft itself, such as where it was supposedly shot down, where and when it was recovered, who was piloting it, etc.
If you have such details about that B5N, I would be very interested in hearing about them.
Because the pilots and sailors talked about their part in the attack!
They wrote that after the war. If the US demands that, regardless of whether it's true or not, how are the Japanese going to deny it? They lost the war and they are a country directly occupied by the US military.
(post is archived)