And how the fuck do you know what Japanese bomb damage is supposed to look like as opposed to American bomb damage would look like? I mean what is the difference, can you explain it?
Yes, of course I can explain it. Example, if you look at the photographs of Wheeler Field, you see neatly aligned rows of aircraft set on fire. Where are the bomb craters? The Japanese are alleged to have used general purpose bombs, nothing exotic. You can see the relevant photographs in the PDF file, as well as photos of other airfields that were bombed from the air for comparison.
How do you know the ship didn't sink after the picture was taken? How do you know the ship was severally damaged and then merely listed as sunk? How do you know how deep the water was at that very spot and the ship was not rest on a shallow bottom?
Most of the photographs of ships attacked at Pearl Harbor show only the USS Arizona. A ship that was listed as being "sunk." There are photographs of it floating on the water long after the smoke has cleared. If you read about it, you will find out that it was scuttled months afterwards.
A ship is not actually sunk unless, at the very least, part of its hull is under water.
You can find answers to these and more of the questions you might have on the pdf. I think you might not be eager to read it, because you have such an emotional reaction to it.
"Where are the bomb craters?"
How do you know the particular bombs dropped from those particular Japanese fighter bombers that attacked that facility at Pearl at that particular altitude and at that particular angle are supposed to produce huge bomb craters? Produce one picture. Just one fucking picture that shows a huge bomb crater produced by those very same Japanese bombs dropped from the same altitude and angle. You aren't going to find one because the bombs from those planes at that altitude don't produce bomb craters the way 500 to 1000 lbs bombs dropped 10,000 feet at 250 mph from strategic heavy bombers like B-17's and B-29s. It just doesn't happen.
You can't produce a single fucking picture just like you can't produce a single fucking eye witness to corroborate your "no-planes, no-bombs" bullshit story.
"Most of the photographs of ships attacked at Pearl Harbor show only the USS Arizona."
Most (you claim but your claims aren't worth a squirt of piss) but certainly not all.
https://4815162342execute.files.wordpress.com/2021/12/pearl-harbor-1.7-battleship-row.jpg
:focal(1649x1288:1650x1289)/https://tf-cmsv2-smithsonianmag-media.s3.amazonaws.com/filer_public/5d/66/5d660be7-b9f5-4681-b3d1-ac741d84dc68/gettyimages-615316446.jpg){kind=link}
/https://tf-cmsv2-smithsonianmag-media.s3.amazonaws.com/filer_public/dd/34/dd3476b1-5ed0-4365-828b-9baf2012352e/gettyimages-543495247.jpg){kind=link}
This picture taken from the Japanese attack planes during the attack showing the ships in battle ship row being attacked
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c7/Attack_on_Pearl_Harbor_Japanese_planes_view.jpg
http://mediad.publicbroadcasting.net/p/kunr/files/styles/x_large/public/201712/3c29812u_1.jpg
That's a Japanese Kate in the frame. Note the ribbed canopy, the very wide wings, the rounded fin and tail stabilizers almost flush with the bottom of the tail. Its a Kate. I am sure that picture is faked, right? Or did the US government build a plane to look like a Kate?
'A ship that was listed as being "sunk."'
It was most likely listed as sunk because one look at it would tell any sane person with a lick of common sense (that excludes you) that it was a complete loss, totaled, kaput, its was never going to sail again.
Now again I dare you, I triple dog dare you, to produce one, just one fucking eye witness who was at Pearl on that day and corroborates your bullshit no-planes, no-bombs story. You can't because no such person exists because the Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor and it was eye witnessed by THOUSANDS upon THOUSANDS of people. I've given you link upon link and could give you more but you can't produce one, not a single fucking one, because your story is TOTAL FUCKING BULLSHIT.
Thanks for the picture containing the Nakajima B5N. I spent a lot of time searching for pictures like that and wasn't able to find any. However, I can see something looks off on that photograph right away. There is a square shadow on the right wing of the aircraft, that looks unlike the fuselage.
How do you know the particular bombs dropped from those particular Japanese fighter bombers that attacked that facility at Pearl at that particular altitude and at that particular angle are supposed to produce huge bomb craters?
The Japanese bombs should produce some damage that radiates out from a central location, since these are according to all the information that's available "land bombs" (general purpose bombs filled with explosives), but we only see planes burning still arranged in neat little rows. No bomb craters or any apparent damage to the nearby buildings.
To prove your point, you would have to show that Japanese "land bombs" were capable of setting airplanes alight while causing no additional damage.
I like the photograph . The Japanese somehow missed the big easy target (the USS Pennsylvania) and hit instead the little destroyer of little military value. The destroyer is among the ships listed as sunk even though it was in a DRY DOCK at the time of the attack. Afterwards, they flooded the dry dock with water, and then it wasn't dry anymore and then they took the photograph that you see.
It was most likely listed as sunk because one look at it would tell any sane person with a lick of common sense (that excludes you) that it was a complete loss, totaled, kaput, its was never going to sail again.
If it's totaled it should be listed as totaled or as a complete loss calling it sunk is not actually representative as what actually happened. Sunk means that the hull was at least partly underwater as a direct result of the attack. Not because they scuttled it afterwards. There were no ships actually sunk as a direct result of the "attack." They are only labeled as such to make the "attack" seem dramatic.
This is a major point. A false-flag attack would produce dramatic photographs, but no serious or crippling damage. Therefore the damage done is exaggerated for propaganda.
If someone were to show that the combat readiness of the US fleet was majorly impacted by the alleged attack, then that would be a strong point against a false-flag attack.
If, as on the other hand, it appears that the damage is very slight, and large easy targets missed or not even attacked, then it becomes natural to suspect that the attack wasn't real.
Now again I dare you, I triple dog dare you, to produce one, just one fucking eye witness who was at Pearl on that day and corroborates your bullshit no-planes, no-bombs story.
I was able to find some articles on the net stating that US servicemen manning a AAA battery at "snake point" mentioned in an interview by Movietone news (a producer of newsreels) that there had been "no enemy planes" in the sky that day. Since then these sites appear to have been de-listed from major search engines. I was never able to find the original clip which seems to have been online at one point.
Of course, you wouldn't be satisfied with just reading the text, and if you saw the original video clip, I imagine you would just go into denial, the way the vaccinated go into denial when you show them the clip of Billy Gates saying that he intends to use vaccines to depopulate the earth.
No-planes no-bombs at Pearl Harbor = FUCKING BULLSHIT There is not one fucking person that saw the attack at Peal Harbor and agrees with your BULLSHIT. Not a single fucking one. THOUSANDS of people saw the attack and talked about and wrote books about it. You can't contradict any of them.
"There is a square shadow on the right wing of the aircraft, that looks unlike the fuselage."
Man, you are fucked in the head. That shadow lines up perfectly with the body of the plane as does the shadow of the tail fin on the right stabilizer. The angles line up perfectly.
That one picture blows your entire bullshit story right out of the water like a Japanese torpedo into the USS Oklahoma. No wonder you have to desperately quibble over that obvious shadow. Jesus fucking Christ if they could fake they rest of the photo so expertly do you think they would make such a glaring, obvious, are repairable mistake. Your desperation is pathetic.
"The Japanese bombs should produce some damage"
You have to be fucking kidding me. That grainy as fuck picture is taken from a mile away and there is smoke covering most of the area of attack. Its impossible to tell where the exact impact points are and what damage was caused around them. Try again but find real evidence not this fucking lame bullshit.
"If it's totaled it should be listed as totaled or as a complete loss calling it sunk is not actually representative as what actually happened. "
You don't know what the proper nomenclature the Navy used in 1941 on damage assessment reports. You are making shit up based on your own assumptions and conjecture. Again you are quibbling about the meaning of "sunk". I don't give a flying fuck what some bean counter allegedly wrote in some report. I can see the pictures of the fucking still burning wrecks with my own two eyes just like THOUSANDS and THOUSANDS of others did as it was happening. Find me one person ONE FUCKING PERSON that was there and said "dur, dur no bombs or torpedoes struck those ships that are damaged and burned up". I have plenty of witnesses to 9/11, Oklahoma City, the USS Liberty that told the truth. You don't have shit.
'a AAA battery at "snake point"'
Where the fuck is "snake point"? I tell you its not anywhere near Pearl Harbor because if it was they would have saw the attack like THOUSANDS and THOUSANDS of people saw it with their own two fucking eyes. The Japanese didn't attack every square inch of Oahu. I bet you "snake point" isn't even on Oahu.
I tell you again that you are completely full of shit and you can't produce ONE FUCKING PERSON that was at Pearl Harbor, not miles away at "snake point", and says that there were "no-planes and no-bombs". There isn't any in existence because your story is complete and utter bullshit.
You are like those people taken in by the Nigerian Prince phone scammers that can't admit that they been fooled even when their own friends and family convince them they were tricked and end up giving away their life saving.
Again, link to one, JUST ONE FUCKING PERSON that was at Pearl Harbor on the day and agrees with your "no planes, no bombs" fantasyland bullshit.
(post is archived)