https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alois_Hitler#Uncertain_identity_of_biological_father
Although Johann Georg Hiedler was considered the officially accepted paternal grandfather of Adolf Hitler by the Third Reich, the question of who his grandfather was has caused much speculation, and the answer remains unknown.[14][15] German historian Joachim Fest wrote that: The indulgence normally accorded to a man's origins is out of place in the case of Adolf Hitler, who made documentary proof of Aryan ancestry a matter of life and death for millions of people but himself possessed no such document. He did not know who his grandfather was. Intensive research into his origins, accounts of which have been distorted by propagandist legends and which are in any case confused and murky, has failed so far to produce a clear picture. National Socialist versions skimmed over the facts and emphasised, for example, that the population of the so-called Waldviertel, from which Hitler came, had been 'tribally German since the Migration of the Peoples', or more generally, that Hitler had 'absorbed the powerful forces of this German granite landscape into his blood through his father'.[16]
Hitler essentially exempted himself from showing proof of aryan ancestry...
And that's a fact
You still having shown anything to actually substantiate Hitler being a joo, other than inuenndo and 2nd or 3rd hand stories. That's a fact. You simply want to promote and support an obvious joo narrative. Hitler has never claimed 'he never knew who his Grandfather was'. That's a fact.
Hans Frank who 'claimed Hitler asked me to investigate his ancestry .... but assured me he spoke with his mother and grandmother concerning the matter ....' could not have happened as Frank claimed, Hitler's Grandmother died before he was born - Hans Frank didn't know that (because Hitler never had the discussion with him) and this information came from Frank as he was being tortured precedent the Nuremburg Trials and coughing up anything he thought might save him. His testimony is wholly unreliable.
I have the Joachim Fest Hitler biography in one of my bookcases - like a half hundred other 'Hitler biographies' it's speculative innuendo (at best) cleverly crafted around fact (joo storytelling) - Joachim Fest was not a neutral historian - as a teen he moved schools to purposely avoid having to join the Hitler Youth (before it was made compulsory) and then only joined the Wehrmacht at 18 so he wouldn't have to join the SS - his words. His book is long boring nonsense that sets out known facts and timelines then weaves in complete conflatory nonsense - toilet paper. You seemed to think your 'that's a fact' makes him a joo - without having actual evidence of him being a joo. If Hitler was a joo - all his 30 + Living relative's would have DNA chromosome markers for jewry - they don't and only a single HALF-SISTER apparently does. Explain that.
And you still pretend there's no possible doubt about hitler's ancestry, which is completely irrational, given the fact that nobody knows who his paternal grandfather actually was
Lets take this slowly , seeing as you completely miss the cogent point each and every time i have mentioned it.
The allegation is 'Hitler was a joo - because no-one knows who his Grandfather is'.
30+ of his living Blood relatives gave DNA samples. Not one had joo ancestry except a HALF SISTER who 'apparently' has a rare joo chromosome and even then they remind that is inconclusive.
Hitler clearly wasn't a joo or all the Blood relatives would have joo ancestry as well - they verifiably don't. That is a fact that no amount of joo sophistry and continual repeating of dispersion, scurrilous innuendo, here say and outright falsity can overcome. Even with the overwhelming lack of proof and substantial evidence to the contrary, Some still just want to believe the dirty filthy joo lugen presse ....
(post is archived)