>The issue is one of being a joo. That speculation is entirely incorrect.
To answer this question we would need to know who was his paternal grandfather... And we don't...
Again, based on the actual evidence, the two Brothers are the only two choices using reason and logic - there is no other credible evidence for anything else. Zero evidence the Brothers were joo-s. Zero. Others can continue to speculate on deliberate OSS/CIA substantiation written by a joo.
EDIT. Simple Circular Marxist inspired logic fallacy.
Just because your Grand mother said your Grand father wasn't a joo , how do we really really know he wasn't. Just bc your Grandmother said she didn't have an affair with a wealthy joo, how do we really really know she's telling the truth. Just because DNA evidence doesn't substantiate our claim , how can you really really be sure that the DNA isn't just wrong. Despite all documented evidence to the contrary, how can you really really rule out the possibility of our claim being true... Straight from the Ministry of Truth - 'The truth is what we declare it to be' .
'
Again, based on the actual evidence, the two Brothers are the only two choices using reason and logic
Your "logic and reason" is flawed; you can't tell for sure there's only two choices, there could be a third you know nothing about, and that's a fact
You're merely equating absence of evidence to evidence of absence here
'there could be a third you know nothing about, and that's a fact ....You're merely equating absence of evidence to evidence of absence here' There is zero proof of it being a joo. All the OSS/CIA propaganda is provably false. Zero DNA evidence from any of the other 30+ living relatives, except supposedly a HALF SISTER. There is zero anything to even an attempt to validate joo ancestry. You're stuck on joo logic - 'it was real in my mind so Disprove my imaginary scenario'.
(post is archived)