Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

When people think about Modern Archery, it's quite easy to be deceived into believing it would be highly inefficient form of combat.

Well that's simply because we have "forgotten" our ancestors past techniques. Something tells me the jews don't want people having access to this knowledge.

When people think about Modern Archery, it's quite easy to be deceived into believing it would be highly inefficient form of combat. Well that's simply because we have "forgotten" our ancestors past techniques. Something tells me the jews don't want people having access to this knowledge.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (21).
[–] • 1 pt

Everything movies show about medieval combat is retarded. They get almost nothing right. Knights were highly trained martial artists, not just dumbasses with blunt swords who moved like a club through molasses. They didnt strike slowly, two handed swords are significantly faster than single handed swords, soldiers fought in formation not in chaotic melees etc etc.

jews show zero respect for Medieval Europe when they make films about them. The go out of their way to misrepresent Medieval Europeans as much as possible to make them look dumb, backwards, filthy, unintelligent etc etc. Whereas they will make any other medieval group of people look noble and crafty and they highlight all the 'good' things about them, even cave dwelling niggers.

jews get everything wrong on purpose, they dont WANT to know about skilled archery to make their movies better, their movies are basically anti white propaganda, they want whites ashamed of their history and heritage, they elevate degenerates and suppress heroic people.

[–] • 0 pt

Before watching Lars Anderson I never thought it would be possible for a single archer to hail down a volley of arrows from a castle wall but fuck me. I can't even begin to fathom how dangerous our ancestors were with a bow.

I love how people try to discredit him and he debunks their shitty claims every time as well.

[–] • 1 pt (edited )

People spent a lot more time outdoors. Local yokels would have spent a lot of time with a bow; either hunting, or target shooting, or just showing off. Kind of like the rednecks today spend a lot of time with their guns.

That said, warfare on foot was done with volley fire, in order to fire at the maximum possible range. Ya know, since that's what the other guy would be doing and in order to stay as far from hand-to-hand as possible. Mounted archers would have been the ones doing quick firing. They existed in many forms, from the chariot to the cossack to the camel jockeys.

You have a point about walls though.

[–] • 0 pt

Look up the battle of agincourt

[–] • 0 pt

Alright, I know of a few good historical content creators and sure enough

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VDnKciXrmnc