Yep, i recall (hopefully i don't screw it up ) various legitime dna/ anthropic studies that show sub Saharan niggers have a 'ghost dna' which in some papers they actually cite (or at least highly suggestive of) homo-erectus markers iirc with zero neanderthal markers and European ancestry contains markers for neanderthal, Denosavarian (sp) and another early homo type iirc with zero 'ghost homo-erectus dna'. The clear (unwritten) conclusion is that sub-saharan/ african niggers are modern day offshoots of homo-erectus and European is a completely different but very similar sapian (in general terms). It also ties into multiple studies between the two Races of things like skull size, slope of forehead, position of the mandible (under bite etc), bone density and musculature substantiated with generalized studies of IQ quotients, emotion based responses, propensity for aggression, lack of empathy, lack of forethought (understanding consequences) etc. They are not like us. Different breeds of dogs (as with all animals/ mammalians and even Botany, Fruits etc for that matter ) show that distinct types can exist within a genus and have measurable (on average) characteristics, traits and temperaments within each clearly definable sub species and that inter-breeding can also enhance various traits (and genetic defects/ illness) or create new 'types', yet apply this to the Homo-sapian and suddenly 'that's racist and verboten'.